Department Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Center for Brain and Cognition, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Front Psychol. 2014 May 27;5:369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00369. eCollection 2014.
While colors are commonplace in everyday metaphors, relatively little is known about implicit color associations to linguistic or semantic concepts in a general population. In this study, we test color associations for ordered linguistic concepts (letters and days). The culture and language specificity of these effects was examined in a large group (457) of Dutch-speaking participants, 92 English-speaking participants, and 49 Hindi-speaking participants. Non-random distributions of color choices were revealed; consistencies were found across the three language groups in color preferences for both days and letters. Interestingly, while the Hindi-speaking participants were presented with letter stimuli matched on phonology, their pattern of letter-to-color preferences still showed similarities with Dutch- and English-speaking participants. Furthermore, we found that that the color preferences corresponded between participants indicating to have conscious color experiences with letters or days (putative synesthetes) and participants who do not (non-synesthetes). We also explored possible mechanisms underlying the color preferences. There were a few specific associations, including red for "A," red for "Monday," and white for "Sunday." We also explored more general mechanisms, such as overall color preferences as shown by Simner et al. (2005). While certainly not all variation can be explained or predicted, the results show that regularities are present in color-to-letter or color-to-day preferences in both putative synesthetes and non-synesthetes across languages. Both letter-to-color and day-to-color preferences were influenced by multiple factors. The findings support a notion of abstract concepts (such as days and letters) that are not represented in isolation, but are connected to perceptual representational systems. Interestingly, at least some of these connections to color representations are shared across different language/cultural groups.
虽然颜色在日常隐喻中很常见,但人们对普通人群中语言或语义概念的隐含颜色联想知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们测试了有序语言概念(字母和日期)的颜色联想。我们在一个较大的荷兰语组(457 人)、92 名英语组和 49 名印地语组参与者中检查了这些效应的文化和语言特异性。颜色选择的非随机分布揭示了;在这三个语言群体中,对于字母和日期的颜色偏好都存在一致性。有趣的是,虽然印地语组参与者接受了在语音上匹配的字母刺激,但他们的字母到颜色偏好模式仍然与荷兰语和英语组参与者相似。此外,我们发现,具有字母或日期的有意识颜色体验的参与者(假定的联觉者)和没有的参与者(非联觉者)之间的颜色偏好是相符的。我们还探讨了颜色偏好背后的可能机制。存在一些特定的关联,包括红色代表“A”,红色代表“星期一”,白色代表“星期日”。我们还探讨了更一般的机制,如 Simner 等人(2005 年)所示的整体颜色偏好。虽然并非所有的变化都可以解释或预测,但结果表明,在不同语言的假定联觉者和非联觉者中,颜色到字母或颜色到日期的偏好都存在规律。字母到颜色和日期到颜色的偏好都受到多种因素的影响。这些发现支持了一个概念,即抽象概念(如日期和字母)不是孤立表示的,而是与感知表示系统相连。有趣的是,至少其中一些与颜色表示的联系在不同的语言/文化群体中是共享的。