Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):20-3. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2010.02003.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24.
In a thought-provoking paper, Simner (2012) highlights and criticizes a number of assumptions concerning synaesthesia. She specifically takes issue with the following assumptions: (1) synaesthesia is strictly a sensory-perceptual phenomenon; (2) consistency of inducer-concurrent pairs is the gold standard for establishing the authenticity of an individual's synaesthesia; and (3) synaesthesia is not heterogeneous. In the wake of this critique, Simner advances a working definition of synaesthesia as a neurological hyper-association that aims to be more inclusive of its variants. We are very sympathetic to Simner's approach and believe that it raises important points that will advance our understanding of synaesthesia. Here we supplement, and sometimes challenge, some of these ideas.
在一篇发人深省的论文中,Simner(2012)强调并批评了一些关于联觉的假设。她特别对以下假设提出质疑:(1)联觉严格来说是一种感觉知觉现象;(2)诱发-伴随对的一致性是确定个体联觉真实性的黄金标准;(3)联觉不是同质的。在这一批评之后,Simner 提出了一个联觉的工作定义,即一种神经超关联,旨在更包容其变体。我们非常赞同 Simner 的方法,并认为它提出了一些重要的观点,将推进我们对联觉的理解。在这里,我们补充并有时挑战了其中的一些观点。