Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, UK.
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):1-15. doi: 10.1348/000712610X528305. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
Studies investigating developmental synaesthesia have sought to describe a number of qualities that might capture in behavioural terms the defining characteristics of this unusual phenomenon. The task of generating a definition is made more difficult by the fact that any description of synaesthesia must be broad enough to capture the 61 different variants of the condition already reported to date. Given these difficulties, the current literature now contains a number of conflicting assumptions about the nature of this condition. Here, I attempt to address several of these divisive areas from a set of contemporary definitions. I present evidence that might argue against previous claims that synaesthesia is (a) a 'merging of the senses', which (b) gives rise to consistent synaesthetic associations over time, with (c) synaesthetic associations that are spatially extended. I then investigate the possible benefits of moving from a behavioural definition to a neurobiological one and explore the ways in which this might force a rethink about the potential outermost boundaries of this fascinating condition.
研究发展性联觉的学者们试图描述一些特质,这些特质可以从行为学角度捕捉到这种异常现象的定义特征。由于必须要足够广泛地描述联觉,才能囊括迄今为止已报告的 61 种不同变体,因此给这个定义下一个定义变得更加困难。鉴于这些困难,目前的文献中包含了一些关于这种情况本质的相互矛盾的假设。在这里,我试图从一系列当代定义中解决其中几个有分歧的领域。我提出的证据可能会反驳以前的说法,即联觉是(a)“感觉的融合”,这会导致(b)随着时间的推移产生一致的联觉联想,并且(c)联觉联想是空间扩展的。然后,我探讨了从行为定义到神经生物学定义的可能好处,并探讨了这可能会如何迫使我们重新思考这种迷人病症的潜在最外层边界。