Action, Brain, and Cognition Laboratory and fMRIOtago, Division of Science, Department of Psychology, University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand.
Front Psychol. 2014 May 19;5:432. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00432. eCollection 2014.
Our recent target article on the allocation of attention to action (herein called the AAA model; Franz, 2012) considered implicated subcortical processes and networks in people with intact corpus callosum (CC) and people without a CC due to commissurotomy or callosotomy. However, a small error in print-namely that the term "commissurotomy" was printed in place of "callosotomy" in some instances-led us to further explore whether any key functional roles have been attributed to the two primary cortical commissures (the anterior and posterior commissures) which remain intact in people with callosotomy, and if so, whether those would be relevant to our current AAA framework. Although existing evidence is sparse, here we consider the hypothesis that the anterior commissure (AC) is a remnant fiber tract which has been largely replaced with evolution of the CC (and we do not herein discuss the posterior commissure further). Indeed, a dearth of studies is available on the AC, calling the need for further research. Herein, we briefly review literature on the AC in humans and then propose a method that might be worthwhile to pursue in future studies.
我们最近的一篇关于注意力分配到行动的目标文章(简称 AAA 模型;Franz,2012)考虑了胼胝体完整的人和因胼胝体切开术或切开术而没有胼胝体的人涉及的皮质下过程和网络。然而,印刷品中的一个小错误——即在某些情况下,术语“胼胝体切开术”被印成了“切开术”——促使我们进一步探讨是否有任何关键的功能角色被归因于切开术患者中保留完整的两个主要皮质连合(前连合和后连合),如果是这样,这些是否与我们目前的 AAA 框架相关。尽管现有证据很少,但在这里我们考虑这样一个假设,即前连合(AC)是一条残留的纤维束,随着胼胝体的进化,它在很大程度上已经被取代(我们在这里不再进一步讨论后连合)。事实上,关于前连合的研究很少,这就需要进一步的研究。在这里,我们简要回顾了人类前连合的文献,然后提出了一种在未来研究中可能值得探索的方法。