Suppr超能文献

波兰注册中心的心内膜导联提取——临床实践与当前的心律学会共识。

Endocardial Lead Extraction in the Polish Registry - clinical practice versus current Heart Rhythm Society consensus.

机构信息

Department of Electrocardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.

Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2014 May 12;10(2):258-65. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.33434. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Over the last 10 years, there has been an increasing number of patients with pacemaker (PM) and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). This study is a retrospective analysis of indications for endocardial pacemaker and ICD lead extractions between 2003 and 2009 based on the experience of three Polish Referral Lead Extraction Centers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Since 2003, the authors have consecutively retrospectively collected all cases and entered the information in the database. All patients which had indication for lead extraction according to Heart Rhythm Society Guidelines were included to final analyze. Between 2003 and 2005, the data were analyzed together. Since 2006, data have been collected and analyzed annually.

RESULTS

In each year, a significant increase in lead extraction was observed. The main indications for LE were infections in 52.4% of patients. Nonfunctioning lead extraction constituted the second group of indications for LE in 29.7% of patients. During the registry period, the percentage of class I indications decreased from 80% in 2006 to only 47% in 2009. On the other hand, increasingly more leads were removed because of class 2, especially class 2b. In 2009, 40% of leads were extracted due to class 2b.

CONCLUSIONS

Polish Registry of Endocardial Lead Extraction 2003-2009, shows an increasing frequency of lead extraction. The main indication for LE is infection: systemic and pocket. An increase in class 2, especially 2b, LE indication in every center during the study period was found.

摘要

简介

在过去的 10 年中,越来越多的患者需要植入起搏器(PM)和埋藏式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。本研究是对 2003 年至 2009 年期间基于三个波兰转诊心脏导线拔除中心经验的心脏内起搏器和 ICD 导线拔除适应证的回顾性分析。

材料与方法

自 2003 年以来,作者连续回顾性地收集了所有病例,并将信息录入数据库。所有符合心律学会指南导线拔除适应证的患者均被纳入最终分析。2003 年至 2005 年,数据一并分析。自 2006 年起,每年收集并分析数据。

结果

每年导线拔除数量均显著增加。导线拔除的主要适应证为感染(52.4%)。其次为无功能导线拔除(29.7%)。在研究期间,I 类适应证的比例从 2006 年的 80%下降至 2009 年的 47%。另一方面,因 II 类适应证,尤其是 IIb 类适应证而拔除的导线数量逐渐增加。2009 年,40%的导线因 IIb 类适应证而被拔除。

结论

2003 年至 2009 年波兰心脏内导线拔除登记研究显示,导线拔除的频率逐渐增加。导线拔除的主要适应证为感染:包括全身感染和囊袋感染。研究期间各中心均发现 II 类适应证,尤其是 IIb 类适应证的比例增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47ae/4042036/1b2bbd0a7b89/AMS-10-20336-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验