Loe Irene M, Feldman Heidi M, Huffman Lynne C
Division of Neonatal and Developmental Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014 Jun;35(5):323-33. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000063.
To investigate the role of executive function (EF) skills, measured by parent-rating and performance-based instruments, as mediators of the effects of gestational age (GA) on functional outcomes and behavior symptoms in preterm (PT) and full-term (FT) preschoolers.
Children born PT (n = 70; mean GA, 29.6 weeks; mean birth weight, 1365 g) were compared to children born FT (n = 79) on composite measures of EF (using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and a performance-based EF battery), adaptive function, prereading skills, and behavior symptoms. For the entire sample, mediation analyses examined the effect of GA on the outcomes with EF as mediator.
Compared to children born FT, children born PT had significantly higher parent-rated EF scores and lower performance-based EF scores, both indicating more problems; furthermore, children born PT had lower adaptive function and prereading scores and more problematic behavior. GA contributed to adaptive function, prereading skills, and behavior symptoms for all children. EF acted as a mediator of GA for all 3 outcomes; different patterns emerged for parent-rated and performance-based EF evaluations. For adaptive function, both EF measures significantly mediated the effects of GA; for prereading skills, only performance-based EF was significant; for behavior symptoms, only parent-rated EF was significant.
We propose standard assessment of EF, using both parent-rating and performance-based EF measures, in young PT children and other children at the risk of EF impairments. EF skills are measurable, mediate important functional outcomes, and may serve as intervention targets.
通过家长评分和基于表现的工具来衡量执行功能(EF)技能,探讨其作为胎龄(GA)对早产(PT)和足月(FT)学龄前儿童功能结局及行为症状影响的中介作用。
将PT出生的儿童(n = 70;平均GA,29.6周;平均出生体重,1365克)与FT出生的儿童(n = 79)在EF综合测量(使用执行功能行为评定量表和基于表现的EF测试组)、适应功能、阅读前技能和行为症状方面进行比较。对于整个样本,中介分析以EF作为中介,检验GA对结局的影响。
与FT出生的儿童相比,PT出生的儿童家长评定的EF得分显著更高,而基于表现的EF得分更低,这两者均表明问题更多;此外,PT出生的儿童适应功能和阅读前得分更低,行为问题更多。GA对所有儿童的适应功能、阅读前技能和行为症状均有影响。EF在所有3个结局中均作为GA的中介;家长评定的EF和基于表现的EF评估呈现出不同模式。对于适应功能,两种EF测量均显著介导了GA的影响;对于阅读前技能,只有基于表现的EF具有显著性;对于行为症状,只有家长评定的EF具有显著性。
我们建议对年幼的PT儿童和其他有EF损伤风险的儿童,使用家长评定和基于表现的EF测量进行EF的标准评估。EF技能是可测量的,介导重要的功能结局,并且可作为干预靶点。