• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经生态学家应该区分廷贝亨的四个问题吗?

Should neuroecologists separate Tinbergen's four questions?

作者信息

Lefebvre Louis

机构信息

Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2015 Aug;117:92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.05.006
PMID:24907419
Abstract

Neuroecologists have been criticized for deriving mechanistic explanations about brains and cognition from functional results. Historically, it appears however that the first functional predictions about adaptive hippocampal specialization for spatial memory of stored food were preceded, not followed, by the mechanistic paradigm of massive modularity that was dominant in the 1990s. More attention is paid nowadays to domain general aspects of cognition and to neural connectivity. Attention is also now given to evo devo principles of brain organization, which suggest conserved routes to evolutionary changes in the brain driven by conserved developmental schedules. Knowledge gained in answering each of Tinbergen's four questions is thus useful in making predictions concerning the other ones. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: In Honor of Jerry Hogan.

摘要

神经生态学家因从功能结果中推导关于大脑和认知的机制性解释而受到批评。然而,从历史上看,关于储存食物空间记忆的适应性海马体特化的首批功能预测,是在20世纪90年代占主导地位的大规模模块化机制范式之前,而非之后出现的。如今,人们更多地关注认知的领域一般性方面以及神经连接性。现在也开始关注大脑组织的演化发育原则,这些原则表明,由保守的发育时间表驱动的大脑进化变化存在保守路径。因此,在回答廷伯根的四个问题中的每一个时所获得的知识,对于预测其他问题是有用的。本文是名为:纪念杰里·霍根 的特刊的一部分。

相似文献

1
Should neuroecologists separate Tinbergen's four questions?神经生态学家应该区分廷贝亨的四个问题吗?
Behav Processes. 2015 Aug;117:92-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 5.
2
Evolution cannot explain how minds work.进化论无法解释思维是如何运作的。
Behav Processes. 2015 Aug;117:82-91. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
3
Explanations for variation in cognitive ability: Behavioural ecology meets comparative cognition.认知能力差异的解释:行为生态学与比较认知学的交汇
Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
4
Tinbergen's four questions: an appreciation and an update.廷伯根的四大问题:赞赏与更新。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Dec;28(12):712-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
5
Endless minds most beautiful.无尽的心灵最为美丽。
Dev Sci. 2007 Jan;10(1):30-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00560.x.
6
The synthetic approach to the study of spatial memory: have we properly addressed Tinbergen's "four questions"?空间记忆研究的综合方法:我们是否正确回答了廷伯根的“四个问题”?
Behav Processes. 2009 Mar;80(3):278-87. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.013.
7
A framework for the study of behavior.行为研究框架。
Behav Processes. 2015 Aug;117:105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Contrasting styles in cognition and behaviour in bumblebees and honeybees.熊蜂和蜜蜂在认知与行为方面的不同风格。
Behav Processes. 2015 Aug;117:59-69. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
9
Using Tinbergen's Four Questions as the Framework for a Neuroscience Capstone Course.以廷伯根的四个问题作为神经科学顶点课程的框架。
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2015 Oct 15;14(1):A46-55. eCollection 2015 Fall.
10
Nine Levels of Explanation : A Proposed Expansion of Tinbergen's Four-Level Framework for Understanding the Causes of Behavior.九级解释:对廷伯根行为因果解释四水平框架的扩展
Hum Nat. 2021 Dec;32(4):748-793. doi: 10.1007/s12110-021-09414-8. Epub 2021 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
An integrative approach to dietary balance across the life course.一种贯穿生命历程的饮食平衡综合方法。
iScience. 2022 Apr 28;25(5):104315. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104315. eCollection 2022 May 20.