Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Calgary Urban Project Society, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Can J Diabetes. 2014 Jun;38(3):198-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.03.012.
This article describes a qualitative research study that examines the encounters by patients of low socioeconomic status with a group medical visit (GMV) program for individuals with or at risk for diabetes. The goal of this study was to generate insights that could be used to guide the development of an inner-city community health centre's GMV services.
Semistructured interviews were conducted with 9 patients who took part in a GMV program that was offered to patients of an inner-city community health centre that serves individuals with low income or homelessness. The interviews addressed barriers to and incentives for attending the GMV program, the GMV program's influence on diabetes-related knowledge and attitudes, and the patients' experience of health and quality of life. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to organize the interview data according to themes and subthemes.
Participants described how the GMV program was implemented, the qualities of a good facilitator, diabetes management as a change process, the role of group members in supporting the change process, and provided general feedback and suggestions.
This article concludes with a series of considerations for the implementation of GMVs. These considerations address group cohesion, the therapeutic effects of group problem solving and support, and the implementation of behaviour-change interventions in GMVs.
本文描述了一项定性研究,考察了社会经济地位较低的患者与糖尿病患者或高危患者的团体医疗访问(GMV)计划之间的接触情况。本研究的目的是提出一些见解,以指导为服务低收入或无家可归者的城市内社区健康中心开发 GMV 服务。
对 9 名参加 GMV 计划的患者进行了半结构化访谈,该计划提供给服务于低收入或无家可归者的城市内社区健康中心的患者。访谈内容涉及参加 GMV 计划的障碍和激励因素、GMV 计划对糖尿病相关知识和态度的影响,以及患者的健康和生活质量体验。采用常规定性内容分析,根据主题和子主题组织访谈数据。
参与者描述了 GMV 计划的实施方式、良好促进者的素质、糖尿病管理作为一个变革过程、小组成员在支持变革过程中的作用,以及提供了一般反馈和建议。
本文最后提出了一系列关于 GMV 实施的考虑因素。这些考虑因素涉及群体凝聚力、群体解决问题和支持的治疗效果,以及在 GMV 中实施行为改变干预措施。