Suppr超能文献

关注权力差异:NP 主导的团体医疗访问如何影响慢性病的管理。

Attending to power differentials: How NP-led group medical visits can influence the management of chronic conditions.

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

CRiHHI: Critical Research in Health and Healthcare Inequities, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2017 Oct;20(5):862-870. doi: 10.1111/hex.12525. Epub 2017 Jan 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In Canada, primary care reform has encouraged innovations, including nurse practitioners (NPs) and group medical visits (GMVs). NP-led GMVs provide an opportunity to examine barriers and enablers to implementing this innovation in primary care.

DESIGN

An instrumental case study design (n=3): two cases where NPs were using GMVs and one case where NPs were not using GMVs, was completed. In-depth interviews with patients and providers (N=24) and 10 hours of direct observation were completed. Interpretive descriptive methods were used to analyse data.

RESULTS/FINDINGS: Two main themes were identified: (i) acquisition of knowledge and (ii) GMVs help shift relationships between patients and health-care providers. Participants discussed how patients and providers learn from one another to facilitate self-management of chronic conditions. They also discussed how the GMV shifts inherent power differentials between providers and between patients and providers.

DISCUSSION

NP-led GMVs are a method of care delivery that harness NPs' professional agency through increased leadership and interprofessional collaboration. GMVs also facilitate an environment that is patient-centred and interprofessional, providing patients with increased confidence to manage their chronic conditions. The GMV provides the opportunity to meet both team-based and patient-centred health-care objectives and may disrupt inherent power differentials that exist in primary care.

摘要

目的

在加拿大,初级保健改革鼓励了创新,包括护士从业者(NP)和团体医疗访问(GMV)。NP 主导的 GMV 为在初级保健中实施这一创新提供了一个机会,以检验障碍和促进因素。

设计

完成了一项工具案例研究设计(n=3):两个 NP 使用 GMV 的案例和一个 NP 不使用 GMV 的案例。对患者和提供者(n=24)进行了深入访谈和 10 小时的直接观察。采用解释性描述方法分析数据。

结果/发现:确定了两个主要主题:(i)知识的获取和(ii)GMV 有助于改变患者和医疗保健提供者之间的关系。参与者讨论了患者和提供者如何相互学习,以促进慢性病的自我管理。他们还讨论了 GMV 如何改变提供者之间以及患者和提供者之间固有的权力差异。

讨论

NP 主导的 GMV 是一种护理提供方式,通过增加领导力和跨专业合作来利用 NP 的专业机构。GMV 还营造了一个以患者为中心和跨专业的环境,使患者更有信心管理自己的慢性病。GMV 提供了一个机会,可以同时满足基于团队和以患者为中心的医疗保健目标,并可能打破初级保健中固有的权力差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
The potential for nurse practitioners in health care reform.护士从业者在医疗改革中的潜力。
J Prof Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;29(5):270-5. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.10.002.
10
The promise of group medical visits.团体医疗就诊的前景。
Nurse Pract. 2013 May 10;38(5):48-53. doi: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000428816.72503.49.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验