Suppr超能文献

通过基础科学教学让医学生为未来的学习做好准备。

Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction.

作者信息

Mylopoulos Maria, Woods Nicole

机构信息

SickKids Learning Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children and The Wilson Centre University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2014 Jul;48(7):667-73. doi: 10.1111/medu.12426.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The construct of 'preparation for future learning' (PFL) is understood as the ability to learn new information from available resources, relate new learning to past experiences and demonstrate innovation and flexibility in problem solving. Preparation for future learning has been proposed as a key competence of adaptive expertise. There is a need for educators to ensure that opportunities are provided for students to develop PFL ability and that assessments accurately measure the development of this form of competence. The objective of this research was to compare the relative impacts of basic science instruction and clinically focused instruction on performance on a PFL assessment (PFLA).

METHODS

This study employed a 'double transfer' design. Fifty-one pre-clerkship students were randomly assigned to either basic science instruction or clinically focused instruction to learn four categories of disease. After completing an initial assessment on the learned material, all participants received clinically focused instruction for four novel diseases and completed a PFLA. The data from the initial assessment and the PFLA were submitted to independent-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

Mean ± standard deviation [SD] scores on the diagnostic cases in the initial assessment were similar for participants in the basic science (0.65 ± 0.11) and clinical learning (0.62 ± 0.11) conditions. The difference was not significant (t[42] = 0.90, p = 0.37, d = 0.27). Analysis of the diagnostic cases on the PFLA revealed significantly higher mean ± SD scores for participants in the basic science learning condition (0.72 ± 0.14) compared with those in the clinical learning condition (0.63 ± 0.15) (t[42] = 2.02, p = 0.05, d = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that the inclusion of basic science instruction enhanced the learning of novel related content. We discuss this finding within the broader context of research on basic science instruction, development of adaptive expertise and assessment in medical education.

摘要

目的

“为未来学习做准备”(PFL)这一概念被理解为从现有资源中学习新信息、将新学习内容与过去经验相联系以及在解决问题时展现创新和灵活性的能力。为未来学习做准备已被提出作为适应性专长的一项关键能力。教育工作者有必要确保为学生提供发展PFL能力的机会,并且评估能够准确衡量这种能力形式的发展情况。本研究的目的是比较基础科学教学和临床聚焦教学对PFL评估(PFLA)成绩的相对影响。

方法

本研究采用“双重转移”设计。51名见习前学生被随机分配到基础科学教学组或临床聚焦教学组,以学习四类疾病。在对所学材料进行初始评估后,所有参与者接受针对四种新疾病的临床聚焦教学,并完成PFLA。将初始评估和PFLA的数据进行独立样本t检验。

结果

在初始评估中,基础科学教学组(0.65±0.11)和临床学习组(0.62±0.11)参与者在诊断病例上的平均±标准差得分相似。差异不显著(t[42]=0.90,p=0.37,d=0.27)。对PFLA上的诊断病例分析显示,基础科学学习组参与者的平均±标准差得分(0.72±0.14)显著高于临床学习组(0.63±0.15)(t[42]=2.02,p=0.05,d=0.62)。

结论

我们的结果表明,纳入基础科学教学增强了对新的相关内容的学习。我们在基础科学教学、适应性专长发展和医学教育评估的更广泛研究背景下讨论这一发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验