Ducatez Simon, Clavel Joanne, Lefebvre Louis
Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205, avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, QC, H3A 1B1, Canada.
Department of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, Division of Organisms and Environment, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720-3114, USA.
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):79-89. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12255. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
Generalist species are more successful than specialists in anthropogenically modified environments or in environments in which they have been introduced, but the nature of the link between generalism and establishment success is unclear. A higher feeding innovation rate has previously been reported in habitat generalist birds from North America. By allowing them to exploit new resources, this higher feeding innovation rate might explain the generalists' advantage. This result might be due to generalists being more likely to find new resources because they are exposed to more diverse environmental conditions. Alternatively, they might differ from specialists in other traits, in particular cognitive skills that might allow them to innovate more complex food searching and handling techniques. To test these hypotheses, we separated avian feeding innovations into a 'technical' (novel searching and handling behaviour) and a 'food type' (incorporation of a new food in a species' diet) category. Technical innovations, but not food type innovations, have previously been shown to correlate with avian brain size, suggesting they reflect cognitive ability. We used a world-wide data base of 2339 feeding innovations recorded in the literature, covering a total of 765 avian species and assessed the correlations between brain size and feeding innovation rates on one side and habitat and diet generalism on the other. Habitat generalism was positively related with food type innovation rate, but not technical innovation rate or brain size. This suggests that habitat generalist species are more likely to incorporate new food types in their diet because of higher chances to find new food resources in their environment, or of a higher opportunism, but not enhanced cognitive skills. In contrast, diet generalist species had higher food type and technical innovation rates, as well as larger brains, suggesting that cognitive skills might help species expand their diet breadth or that an increase in diet breadth might favour the evolution of enhanced cognitive abilities. Our results provide new insights into the nature of the generalists' advantage in the face of environmental changes, and suggest that dietary and habitat generalism are different, but convergent, routes to feeding flexibility and adaptation to changed environments.
在人为改造的环境或引入它们的环境中,广适性物种比狭适性物种更成功,但广适性与成功定殖之间联系的本质尚不清楚。此前有报道称,北美栖息地广适性鸟类的觅食创新率更高。通过让它们利用新资源,这种更高的觅食创新率可能解释了广适性物种的优势。这一结果可能是因为广适性物种更有可能找到新资源,因为它们接触到更多样化的环境条件。或者,它们可能在其他特征上与狭适性物种不同,特别是认知技能,这可能使它们能够创新更复杂的食物搜索和处理技术。为了验证这些假设,我们将鸟类的觅食创新分为“技术型”(新颖的搜索和处理行为)和“食物类型”(物种饮食中纳入新食物)两类。此前已表明,技术创新而非食物类型创新与鸟类脑容量相关,这表明它们反映了认知能力。我们使用了一个全球数据库,其中记录了文献中2339项觅食创新,涵盖了总共765种鸟类,并评估了脑容量与觅食创新率之间以及栖息地和饮食广适性之间的相关性。栖息地广适性与食物类型创新率呈正相关,但与技术创新率或脑容量无关。这表明栖息地广适性物种更有可能在其饮食中纳入新的食物类型,这是因为它们在环境中找到新食物资源的机会更高,或者是因为机会主义更强,但并非认知技能增强。相比之下,饮食广适性物种具有更高的食物类型和技术创新率,以及更大的脑容量,这表明认知技能可能有助于物种扩大其饮食广度,或者饮食广度的增加可能有利于增强认知能力的进化。我们的研究结果为广适性物种在面对环境变化时的优势本质提供了新的见解,并表明饮食和栖息地广适性是不同但趋同的途径,可实现觅食灵活性和对变化环境的适应。