Suppr超能文献

急诊医学从业者能否基于简短的医学评估预测精神病患者的处置情况?

Can emergency medicine practitioners predict disposition of psychiatric patients based on a brief medical evaluation?

作者信息

Drescher Michael J, Russell Frances M, Pappas Maryanne, Pepper David A

机构信息

aDivision of Emergency Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine and Hartford Hospital bDivision of Emergency Medicine, Hartford Hospital cDepartment of Psychiatry, Hartford Hospital and Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut dDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;22(3):188-91. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000131.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) often provide 'medical clearance' before evaluation by a psychiatry practitioner (PP). We set out to determine the level of agreement between EMP impression and disposition as determined by PPs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study in an urban tertiary teaching hospital emergency department. We collected data from February to April 2011. We used a convenience sample of patient encounters evaluated by EMPs and subsequent referral for psychiatric evaluation. We asked EMPs whether they thought the patients would be admitted or discharged following psychiatric evaluation, and if discharged, whether to outpatient psychiatric follow-up or to no follow-up. EMPs were asked to base their opinion upon their general impression following their brief medical evaluation. They were not given guidelines on which to base their decision. The EMPs were blind to PP decisions. The κ-statistic was used to calculate agreement between the EMP's impression and disposition decision by the PP. We excluded patients who were acutely intoxicated, in police custody, or lived in an extended care facility.

RESULTS

We included 156 patient encounters over the study period and had complete data for 152 encounters. Of these, 86 (55%) were admitted, 46 (30%) were discharged with no specific psychiatric follow-up, and 20 (13%) were discharged with a follow-up plan. EMPs predicted the exact disposition in 77/152 (51%) cases (κ=0.264, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.333). Agreement was higher for admitted patients, with EMPs predicting inpatient admission for 57/86 (66%) of these patients. Other factors associated with higher agreement scores were years in emergency medicine practice by the EMP and suicidal ideation by the patient.

CONCLUSION

EMPs did not reliably predict psychiatric disposition decisions based on clinical 'gestalt'. Future research will focus on clinical guidelines to help EMPs better independently assess need for emergency psychiatric services.

摘要

目的

急诊医学从业者(EMPs)常在精神科从业者(PPs)进行评估前提供“医疗许可”。我们旨在确定EMPs的印象与PPs确定的处置之间的一致程度。

患者与方法

这是一项在城市三级教学医院急诊科进行的前瞻性观察研究。我们收集了2011年2月至4月的数据。我们使用了一个便利样本,即由EMPs评估并随后转诊进行精神科评估的患者就诊情况。我们询问EMPs他们认为患者在精神科评估后会被收治还是出院,如果出院,是进行门诊精神科随访还是不进行随访。EMPs被要求根据他们简短的医学评估后的总体印象做出判断。他们没有得到用于决策的指导方针。EMPs对PPs的决策不知情。κ统计量用于计算EMPs的印象与PPs的处置决策之间的一致性。我们排除了急性中毒、被警方拘留或住在长期护理机构的患者。

结果

在研究期间,我们纳入了156例患者就诊情况,其中152例有完整数据。其中,86例(55%)被收治,46例(30%)出院且无特定精神科随访,20例(13%)出院并制定了随访计划。EMPs在77/152(51%)的病例中准确预测了处置情况(κ=0.264,95%置信区间0.77 - 0.333)。对于被收治的患者,一致性更高,EMPs对其中57/86(66%)的患者预测为住院治疗。与更高一致性得分相关的其他因素包括EMPs从事急诊医学工作的年限以及患者的自杀意念。

结论

EMPs不能基于临床“整体印象”可靠地预测精神科处置决策。未来的研究将集中于临床指南,以帮助EMPs更好地独立评估对急诊精神科服务的需求。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验