Habbal Dina, Gosseries Olivia, Noirhomme Quentin, Renaux Jerome, Lesenfants Damien, Bekinschtein Tristan A, Majerus Steve, Laureys Steven, Schnakers Caroline
Coma Science Group, Cyclotron Research Center and Neurology Department, University and University Hospital of Liège , Liège , Belgium .
Brain Inj. 2014;28(9):1171-9. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.920519. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
The aim of the study was to validate the use of electromyography (EMG) for detecting responses to command in patients in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) or in minimally conscious state (MCS).
Thirty-eight patients were included in the study (23 traumatic, 25 patients >1 year post-onset), 10 diagnosed as being in VS/UWS, eight in MCS- (no response to command) and 20 in MCS+ (response to command). Eighteen age-matched controls participated in the experiment. The paradigm consisted of three commands (i.e. 'Move your hands', 'Move your legs' and 'Clench your teeth') and one control sentence (i.e. 'It is a sunny day') presented in random order. Each auditory stimulus was repeated 4 times within one block with a stimulus-onset asynchrony of 30 seconds.
Post-hoc analyses with Bonferroni correction revealed that EMG activity was higher solely for the target command in one patient in permanent VS/UWS and in three patients in MCS+.
The use of EMG could help clinicians to detect conscious patients who do not show any volitional response during standard behavioural assessments. However, further investigations should determine the sensitivity of EMG as compared to neuroimaging and electrophysiological assessments.
本研究旨在验证肌电图(EMG)用于检测植物状态/无反应觉醒综合征(VS/UWS)或最低意识状态(MCS)患者对指令反应的有效性。
38例患者纳入本研究(23例创伤性脑损伤,25例发病1年以上),其中10例诊断为VS/UWS,8例为MCS-(对指令无反应),20例为MCS+(对指令有反应)。18名年龄匹配的对照者参与实验。实验范式包括三个指令(即“移动你的手”、“移动你的腿”和“咬紧牙关”)和一个对照句子(即“天气晴朗”),以随机顺序呈现。每个听觉刺激在一个组块内重复4次,刺激起始异步时间为30秒。
采用Bonferroni校正的事后分析显示,仅在1例永久性VS/UWS患者和3例MCS+患者中,目标指令的EMG活动更高。
EMG的应用有助于临床医生检测在标准行为评估中未表现出任何自主反应的意识清醒患者。然而,与神经影像学和电生理评估相比,进一步的研究应确定EMG的敏感性。