Aerts Inne, Cumps Elke, Verhagen Evert, Wuyts Bram, Van De Gucht Sam, Meeusen Romain
Dept of Human Physiology and Sports Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
J Sport Rehabil. 2015 Feb;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2013-0099. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
In jump-landing sports, the injury mechanism that most frequently results in an injury is the jump-landing movement. Influencing the movement patterns and biomechanical predisposing factors are supposed to decrease injury occurrence.
To evaluate the influence of a 3-mo coach-supervised jump-landing prevention program on jump-landing technique using the jump-landing scoring (JLS) system.
Randomized controlled trial.
On-field.
116 athletes age 15-41 y, with 63 athletes in the control group and 53 athletes in the intervention group.
The intervention program in this randomized control trial was administered at the start of the basketball season 2010-11. The jump-landing training program, supervised by the athletic trainers, was performed for a period of 3 mo.
The jump-landing technique was determined by registering the jump-landing technique of all athletes with the JLS system, pre- and postintervention.
After the prevention program, the athletes of the male and female intervention groups landed with a significantly less erect position than those in the control groups (P < .05). This was presented by a significant improvement in maximal hip flexion, maximal knee flexion, hip active range of motion, and knee active range of motion. Another important finding was that postintervention, knee valgus during landing diminished significantly (P < .05) in the female intervention group compared with their control group. Furthermore, the male intervention group significantly improved (P < .05) the scores of the JLS system from pre- to postintervention.
Malalignments such as valgus position and insufficient knee flexion and hip flexion, previously identified as possible risk factors for lower-extremity injuries, improved significantly after the completion of the prevention program. The JLS system can help in identifying these malalignments.
Therapy, prevention, level 1b.
在跳跃落地类运动中,最常导致损伤的损伤机制是跳跃落地动作。影响运动模式和生物力学易感因素被认为可以减少损伤的发生。
使用跳跃落地评分(JLS)系统评估为期3个月的由教练指导的跳跃落地预防计划对跳跃落地技术的影响。
随机对照试验。
现场。
116名年龄在15 - 41岁的运动员,对照组63名运动员,干预组53名运动员。
本随机对照试验中的干预计划在2010 - 11赛季篮球赛季开始时实施。由运动训练师监督的跳跃落地训练计划持续进行3个月。
通过在干预前后使用JLS系统记录所有运动员的跳跃落地技术来确定跳跃落地技术。
预防计划实施后,男性和女性干预组运动员落地时的直立姿势明显少于对照组(P < 0.05)。这表现为最大髋关节屈曲、最大膝关节屈曲、髋关节主动活动范围和膝关节主动活动范围有显著改善。另一个重要发现是,干预后,与对照组相比,女性干预组落地时的膝外翻明显减少(P < 0.05)。此外,男性干预组从干预前到干预后JLS系统的得分显著提高(P < 0.05)。
先前被确定为下肢损伤可能危险因素的诸如外翻位、膝关节屈曲不足和髋关节屈曲不足等排列不齐在预防计划完成后有显著改善。JLS系统有助于识别这些排列不齐。
治疗、预防,1b级。