Bathe Chantal, Fennen Lena, Heering Theresa, Greif Alexander, Dubbeldam Rosemary
Movement Science, Westfälische Wilhelms University Münster, Münster, Germany.
Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Jun 2;9(2):e001508. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001508. eCollection 2023.
Aim of this systematic review was to summarise training interventions designed to reduce biomechanical risk factors associated with increased risk of lower extremity landing injuries and to evaluate their practical implications in amateur sports.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
MEDLINE, Scopus and SPORTDiscus.
Training intervention(s) aimed at reducing biomechanical risk factors and/or injury rates included the following: (1) prospective or (non-)randomised controlled study design; (2) risk factors that were measured with valid two-dimensional or three-dimensional motion analysis systems or Landing Error Scoring System during jump landings. In addition, meta-analyses were performed, and the risk of bias was assessed.
Thirty-one studies met all inclusion criteria, capturing 11 different training interventions (eg, feedback and plyometrics) and 974 participants. A significantly medium effect of technique training (both instruction and feedback) and dynamic strengthening (ie, plyometrics with/without strengthening) on knee flexion angle (g=0.77; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.21) was shown. Only one-third of the studies had training interventions that required minimal training setup and additional coaching educations.
This systematic review highlights that amateur coaches can decrease relevant biomechanical risk factors by means of minimal training setup, for example, instructing to focus on a soft landing, even within only one training session of simple technique training. The meta-analysis emphasises implementing technique training as stand-alone or combined with dynamic strengthening into amateur sport training routine.
本系统评价旨在总结为降低与下肢落地损伤风险增加相关的生物力学危险因素而设计的训练干预措施,并评估其在业余运动中的实际意义。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
MEDLINE、Scopus和SPORTDiscus。
旨在降低生物力学危险因素和/或损伤率的训练干预措施包括以下内容:(1)前瞻性或(非)随机对照研究设计;(2)在跳跃落地过程中,使用有效的二维或三维运动分析系统或落地误差评分系统测量的危险因素。此外,进行了荟萃分析,并评估了偏倚风险。
31项研究符合所有纳入标准,涵盖11种不同的训练干预措施(如反馈和增强式训练)和974名参与者。结果显示,技术训练(包括指导和反馈)和动态强化训练(即有/无强化的增强式训练)对膝关节屈曲角度有显著的中等效应(g=0.77;95%CI 0.33至1.21)。只有三分之一的研究采用了所需训练设置最少且无需额外教练培训的训练干预措施。
本系统评价强调,业余教练可以通过最少的训练设置来降低相关的生物力学危险因素,例如,即使在简单技术训练的单次训练中,指导运动员专注于软着陆。荟萃分析强调将技术训练单独或与动态强化训练相结合纳入业余运动训练常规。