LoPachin Richard M, Gavin Terrence
Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine , 111 E. 210th Street, Bronx, New York 10467, United States.
Chem Res Toxicol. 2014 Jul 21;27(7):1081-91. doi: 10.1021/tx5001046. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
Aldehydes are electrophilic compounds to which humans are pervasively exposed. Despite a significant health risk due to exposure, the mechanisms of aldehyde toxicity are poorly understood. This ambiguity is likely due to the structural diversity of aldehyde derivatives and corresponding differences in chemical reactions and biological targets. To gain mechanistic insight, we have used parameters based on the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory to profile the different aldehyde subclasses with respect to electronic character (softness, hardness), electrophilic reactivity (electrophilic index), and biological nucleophilic targets. Our analyses indicate that short chain aldehydes and longer chain saturated alkanals are hard electrophiles that cause toxicity by forming adducts with hard biological nucleophiles, e.g., primary nitrogen groups on lysine residues. In contrast, α,β-unsaturated carbonyl derivatives, alkenals, and the α-oxoaldehydes are soft electrophiles that preferentially react with soft nucleophilic thiolate groups on cysteine residues. The aldehydes can therefore be grouped into subclasses according to common electronic characteristics (softness/hardness) and molecular mechanisms of toxicity. As we will discuss, the toxic potencies of these subgroups are generally related to corresponding electrophilicities. For some aldehydes, however, predictions of toxicity based on electrophilicity are less accurate due to inherent physicochemical variables that limit target accessibility, e.g., steric hindrance and solubility. The unsaturated aldehydes are also members of the conjugated type-2 alkene chemical class that includes α,β-unsaturated amide, ketone, and ester derivatives. Type-2 alkenes are electrophiles of varying softness and electrophilicity that share a common mechanism of toxicity. Therefore, exposure to an environmental mixture of unsaturated carbonyl derivatives could cause "type-2 alkene toxicity" through additive interactions. Finally, we propose that environmentally derived aldehydes can accelerate diseases by interacting with endogenous aldehydes generated during oxidative stress. This review provides a basis for understanding aldehyde mechanisms and environmental toxicity through the context of electronic structure, electrophilicity, and nucleophile target selectivity.
醛类是人类普遍接触的亲电化合物。尽管接触醛类会带来重大健康风险,但人们对醛类毒性的机制了解甚少。这种不明确性可能是由于醛类衍生物的结构多样性以及化学反应和生物靶点的相应差异所致。为了深入了解其机制,我们使用了基于软硬酸碱(HSAB)理论的参数,来描述不同醛类亚组在电子特性(软度、硬度)、亲电反应性(亲电指数)和生物亲核靶点方面的特征。我们的分析表明,短链醛类和较长链饱和链烷醛是硬亲电试剂,它们通过与硬生物亲核试剂(如赖氨酸残基上的伯氨基)形成加合物而导致毒性。相比之下,α,β-不饱和羰基衍生物、烯醛和α-氧代醛是软亲电试剂,它们优先与半胱氨酸残基上的软亲核硫醇盐基团反应。因此,醛类可以根据共同的电子特性(软度/硬度)和毒性分子机制分为不同亚组。正如我们将讨论的,这些亚组的毒性强度通常与相应的亲电性有关。然而,对于某些醛类,由于限制靶点可及性的固有物理化学变量(如空间位阻和溶解度),基于亲电性的毒性预测不太准确。不饱和醛类也是共轭2型烯烃化学类别的成员,该类别包括α,β-不饱和酰胺、酮和酯衍生物。2型烯烃是具有不同软度和亲电活性的亲电试剂,它们具有共同的毒性机制。因此,接触不饱和羰基衍生物的环境混合物可能通过加性相互作用导致“2型烯烃毒性”。最后,我们提出环境来源的醛类可以通过与氧化应激期间产生的内源性醛类相互作用来加速疾病。本综述通过电子结构、亲电性和亲核靶点选择性的背景,为理解醛类机制和环境毒性提供了基础。