Melvin Malia N, Smith-Ryan Abbie E, Wingfield Hailee L, Fultz Sarah N, Roelofs Erica J
Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Exercise & Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Applied Physiology Laboratory, Department of Exercise & Sport Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Sep;40(9):1973-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of ultrasound measures of muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) and echo intensity (EI) in overweight subjects. A secondary purpose was to evaluate racial differences in EI, mCSA and body composition. In 33 overweight subjects, mCSA and EI were determined from a panoramic ultrasound scan of the vastus lateralis. Body composition was determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Reliability of mCSA and EI was calculated from the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of the measurement (SEM) and minimal difference (MD). The ICC, SEM and MD for mCSA and EI were 0.87, 2.12, 5.89 and 0.74, 4.58, 12.69, respectively. There were no significant racial differences in body composition (p > 0.05); however, EI was significantly lower for black subjects (p = 0.018). These results suggest ultrasound measures of mCSA and EI are reliable in overweight subjects, and EI may provide additional muscle composition evaluations, beyond DXA measures.
本研究的目的是评估超声测量超重受试者肌肉横截面积(mCSA)和回声强度(EI)的可靠性。次要目的是评估EI、mCSA和身体成分的种族差异。对33名超重受试者,通过股外侧肌的全景超声扫描测定mCSA和EI。使用双能X线吸收法(DXA)测定身体成分。根据组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)和最小差异(MD)计算mCSA和EI的可靠性。mCSA和EI的ICC、SEM和MD分别为0.87、2.12、5.89和0.74、4.58、12.69。身体成分方面无显著种族差异(p>0.05);然而,黑人受试者的EI显著较低(p = 0.018)。这些结果表明,超声测量超重受试者的mCSA和EI是可靠的,并且EI可能提供超出DXA测量的额外肌肉成分评估。