Roblin Xavier, Rinaudo M, Del Tedesco E, Phelip J M, Genin C, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Paul S
Service de Gastrologie-Entérologie-Hépatologie, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Laboratoire d'Immunologie et d'Immunomonitoring CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;109(8):1250-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.146. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
Several decision algorithms based on the measurement of infliximab (IFX) trough levels and antibodies to IFX have been proposed. Whether such algorithms can be extrapolated to the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab (ADA) has yet to be determined.
A prospective study included all consecutive patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) having a disease flare while being on ADA 40 mg every 2 weeks were included. All patients were primary responders to ADA therapy and were anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) naive. ADA trough levels and antibodies against ADA (AAA) were measured blinded to clinical data (Elisa LISA-Tracker, Theradiag). All patients were optimized with ADA 40 mg weekly. Four months later, in the absence of clinical remission (CR; Crohn's disease activity index <150 for Crohn's disease (CD), and Mayo score <2 for ulcerative colitis), patients were treated with IFX therapy. Patients were divided into three groups based on ADA trough levels and based on previous studies: group A, ADA>4.9 μg/ml; group B, ADA<4.9 μg/ml and undetectable levels of AAA (<10 ng/ml); and group C, ADA<4.9 μg/ml and AAA >10 ng/ml.
A total of 82 patients were included (55% CD; mean age=43 years, disease duration=7.4 years, duration of ADA therapy=17 months). After optimization of ADA treatment, 29.2% of patients achieved CR in group A (N=41), 67% in group B (N=24), and 12% in group C (N=17; P<0.01 between groups A/B and B/C). C-reactive protein level at the time of relapse, disease duration, duration of ADA therapy, and IBD type was not predictive of CR after ADA optimization by univariate analysis. The response to ADA optimization was significantly more durable in group B (15 months) than in groups A and C (4 and 5 months, respectively). Fifty-two patients who failed following ADA optimization (63%) were treated with IFX, and 30.6% of them achieved CR. CR rates following IFX initiation were 6.9%, 25%, and 80% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.01 between groups C/A and between groups C/B). Duration of response to IFX was significantly higher in group C than in groups A and B (14 vs. 3 and 5 months, respectively, P<0.01).
The presence of low ADA trough levels without AAA is strongly predictive of clinical response in 67% of cases after ADA optimization. Conversely, low ADA levels with detectable AAA are associated with ADA failure, and switching to IFX should be considered. ADA trough levels >4.9 μg/ml are associated with failure of two anti-TNF agents (ADA and IFX) in 90% of cases, and switching to another drug class should be considered.
已经提出了几种基于英夫利昔单抗(IFX)谷浓度和抗IFX抗体测量的决策算法。此类算法是否可外推至阿达木单抗(ADA)的药代动力学尚未确定。
一项前瞻性研究纳入了所有连续的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者,这些患者在每2周接受40mg ADA治疗时出现疾病复发。所有患者均为ADA治疗的初始反应者且既往未使用过抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)药物。在对临床数据不知情的情况下测量ADA谷浓度和抗ADA抗体(AAA)(酶联免疫吸附测定法LISA-Tracker,Theradiag公司)。所有患者均接受每周40mg ADA的优化治疗。四个月后,若未达到临床缓解(CR;克罗恩病(CD)的克罗恩病活动指数<150,溃疡性结肠炎的梅奥评分<2),则患者接受IFX治疗。根据ADA谷浓度并基于既往研究将患者分为三组:A组,ADA>4.9μg/ml;B组,ADA<4.9μg/ml且AAA水平不可测(<10ng/ml);C组,ADA<4.9μg/ml且AAA>10ng/ml。
共纳入82例患者(55%为CD;平均年龄=43岁,病程=7.4年,ADA治疗时间=17个月)。ADA治疗优化后,A组(N=41)29.2%的患者达到CR,B组(N=24)为67%,C组(N=17)为12%(A/B组与B/C组之间P<0.01)。单因素分析显示,复发时的C反应蛋白水平、病程、ADA治疗时间和IBD类型均不能预测ADA优化后的CR情况。B组对ADA优化的反应持续时间(15个月)明显长于A组和C组(分别为4个月和5个月)。ADA优化失败的52例患者(63%)接受了IFX治疗,其中30.6%达到CR。IFX起始治疗后的CR率在A组、B组和C组分别为6.9%、25%和80%(C/A组和C/B组之间P<0.01)。C组对IFX的反应持续时间明显长于A组和B组(分别为14个月、3个月和5个月,P<0.01)。
ADA谷浓度低且无AAA强烈预示ADA优化后67%的病例会出现临床反应。相反,ADA水平低且可检测到AAA与ADA治疗失败相关,应考虑换用IFX。ADA谷浓度>4.9μg/ml与90%的病例中两种抗TNF药物(ADA和IFX)治疗失败相关,应考虑换用另一类药物。