Tighe Donal, Hall Barry, Jeyarajah Shivashini Kirthi, Smith Sinead, Breslin Niall, Ryan Barbara, McNamara Deirdre
*AMNCH Tallaght, Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland; and †Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2017 Jul;23(7):1154-1159. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001093.
Loss of response (LOR) is a big concern for anti-TNFa therapies in inflammatory bowel disease. Immunomonitoring may be useful to optimize response rates and overcome secondary LOR.
This was an observational retrospective cohort study of a group of patients with inflammatory bowel disease on infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) who had anti-TNFa trough and antibody levels measured, during maintenance phase of treatment. Anti-TNFa trough and antibody levels were measured using standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques. Baseline patient characteristics were determined and patients were reviewed 1 year later. Clinical assessment took place with partial Mayo scores for ulcerative colitis and Harvey-Bradshaw index for Crohn's disease. C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin were also measured. Poor outcomes were defined as the following: need for rescue steroids, dose intensification, surgery, or treatment discontinuation.
Seventy-four patients were included in the study, 37 (50%) were female, mean age 41 years, 61 (82%) had Crohn's disease, and 42 (57%) ulcerative colitis. Forty-two (57%) patients received IFX and 32 (43%) ADA. Mean IFX trough was 3.6 μg/mL and mean ADA troughs were 3.78 μg/mL. Twenty-seven percent of patients (n = 20) overall had a poor outcome, with a similar proportion in each group 24% (n = 10) IFX and 31% (n = 10) ADA (P value 0.24). Of the cohort, 14.2% (6/42) treated with IFX had subtherapeutic trough levels, 6.2% (2/32) of ADA patients had a trough level <1 μg/mL (P value = 0.273) There was no difference in mean trough according to outcome (4.9 μg/mL poor versus 5.4 μg/mL good, P value 0.14). Low IFX trough levels did correlate with high CRP, low albumin and response rates, mean CRP 6.66 μg/mL (n = 3), mean albumin 37 g/L for patients with low trough levels and poor response versus CRP 2.0 μg/mL (n = 24), mean albumin 43 g/L for patients with high trough levels and good response (P = 0.009, 95% confidence interval, -0.78 to -0.12).
LOR is still a big concern with anti-TNFa therapies. Stand-alone anti-TNFa trough and antibody levels are not useful at predicting LOR/disease progression at 1 year, but low trough levels do correlate well with elevated CRP, hypoalbuminaemia, and poor response rates.
反应丧失(LOR)是炎症性肠病抗TNFα治疗中的一个重大问题。免疫监测可能有助于优化反应率并克服继发性LOR。
这是一项观察性回顾性队列研究,研究对象为一组接受英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADA)治疗的炎症性肠病患者,在治疗维持阶段测量了抗TNFα谷浓度和抗体水平。使用标准酶联免疫吸附测定技术测量抗TNFα谷浓度和抗体水平。确定患者的基线特征,并在1年后对患者进行复查。采用溃疡性结肠炎的部分梅奥评分和克罗恩病的哈维-布拉德肖指数进行临床评估。还测量了C反应蛋白(CRP)和白蛋白。不良结局定义如下:需要使用挽救性类固醇、增加剂量、手术或停药。
74例患者纳入研究,37例(50%)为女性,平均年龄41岁,61例(82%)患有克罗恩病,42例(57%)患有溃疡性结肠炎。42例(57%)患者接受IFX治疗,32例(43%)接受ADA治疗。IFX的平均谷浓度为3.6μg/mL,ADA的平均谷浓度为3.78μg/mL。总体上27%的患者(n = 20)有不良结局,每组比例相似,IFX组为24%(n = 10),ADA组为31%(n = 10)(P值0.24)。在该队列中,接受IFX治疗的患者中有14.2%(6/42)谷浓度低于治疗水平,ADA患者中有6.2%(2/32)谷浓度<1μg/mL(P值 = 0.273)。根据结局,平均谷浓度无差异(不良结局组为4.9μg/mL,良好结局组为5.4μg/mL,P值0.14)。低IFX谷浓度确实与高CRP、低白蛋白和反应率相关,谷浓度低且反应差的患者平均CRP为6.66μg/mL(n = 3),平均白蛋白为37g/L,而谷浓度高且反应良好的患者平均CRP为2.0μg/mL(n = 24),平均白蛋白为43g/L(P = 0.009,95%置信区间,-0.78至-0.12)。
LOR仍然是抗TNFα治疗中的一个重大问题。单独的抗TNFα谷浓度和抗体水平在预测1年时的LOR/疾病进展方面无用,但低谷浓度确实与CRP升高、低白蛋白血症和低反应率密切相关。