Sohn Chang Hwan, Ryoo Seung Mok, Seo Dong Woo, Lee Jae Ho, Oh Bum Jin, Lim Kyoung Soo, Huh Jin Won, Kim Won Young
Department of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 86, Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 138-736, Korea.
Intern Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;9(6):671-6. doi: 10.1007/s11739-014-1092-5. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
The aim of this study was to assess whether delayed resuscitation bundle compliance from 6 to 12 h after a diagnosis of septic shock has an impact upon 28-day mortality. A prospective observational study on consecutive adult patients with septic shock was performed in the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care university-affiliated hospital between January 2010 and July 2012. Compliance with the resuscitation bundle was assessed at 6 and 12 h after a septic shock diagnosis (time 0). Patients were divided into three groups: early compliance (≤6 h), delayed compliance (>6 but ≤12 h), and non-compliance (>12 h). The 28-day mortality was compared among the groups. A total of 332 patients were included, with an overall 28-day mortality of 17.2%. The mean age was 63.9 years; 57.8% were men. Early compliance was achieved in 195 patients (58.7%), delayed compliance in 59 patients (19.8%), and non-compliance in 78 patients (23.5%). The groups did not differ in baseline sequential organ failure assessment illness severity. However, the non-compliance group had a significantly higher mortality (29.5%) than the delayed-compliance (13.6%) and early-compliance (13.3%) groups (p = 0.04). Delayed compliance was associated with a lower mortality risk than non-compliance (adjusted odds ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.82, p = 0.02). In conclusion, if bundle therapy be started at the time of presentation, the outcome of delayed resuscitation bundle compliance within 12 h is same as that of early resuscitation bundle compliance within 6 h, and these are better than that of the patients who had late or no compliance.