Roux C, Fraïsse C, Castric V, Vekemans X, Pogson G H, Bierne N
Université Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France; CNRS-UMR5554 Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Station Méditerranéenne de l'Environnement Littoral, Sète, France; Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Evol Biol. 2014 Aug;27(8):1662-75. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12425. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
The use of molecular data to reconstruct the history of divergence and gene flow between populations of closely related taxa represents a challenging problem. It has been proposed that the long-standing debate about the geography of speciation can be resolved by comparing the likelihoods of a model of isolation with migration and a model of secondary contact. However, data are commonly only fit to a model of isolation with migration and rarely tested against the secondary contact alternative. Furthermore, most demographic inference methods have neglected variation in introgression rates and assume that the gene flow parameter (Nm) is similar among loci. Here, we show that neglecting this source of variation can give misleading results. We analysed DNA sequences sampled from populations of the marine mussels, Mytilus edulis and M. galloprovincialis, across a well-studied mosaic hybrid zone in Europe and evaluated various scenarios of speciation, with or without variation in introgression rates, using an Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) approach. Models with heterogeneous gene flow across loci always outperformed models assuming equal migration rates irrespective of the history of gene flow being considered. By incorporating this heterogeneity, the best-supported scenario was a long period of allopatric isolation during the first three-quarters of the time since divergence followed by secondary contact and introgression during the last quarter. By contrast, constraining migration to be homogeneous failed to discriminate among any of the different models of gene flow tested. Our simulations thus provide statistical support for the secondary contact scenario in the European Mytilus hybrid zone that the standard coalescent approach failed to confirm. Our results demonstrate that genomic variation in introgression rates can have profound impacts on the biological conclusions drawn from inference methods and needs to be incorporated in future studies.
利用分子数据重建近缘分类群种群之间的分化历史和基因流是一个具有挑战性的问题。有人提出,关于物种形成地理的长期争论可以通过比较隔离与迁移模型和二次接触模型的似然性来解决。然而,数据通常只适合隔离与迁移模型,很少针对二次接触替代模型进行检验。此外,大多数人口统计学推断方法都忽略了基因渗入率的变化,并假设基因流参数(Nm)在各基因座之间相似。在这里,我们表明忽略这种变异来源可能会产生误导性结果。我们分析了从欧洲一个经过充分研究的镶嵌杂交带的海洋贻贝紫贻贝和地中海贻贝种群中采样的DNA序列,并使用近似贝叶斯计算(ABC)方法评估了有无基因渗入率变化的各种物种形成情景。无论考虑何种基因流历史,跨基因座具有异质基因流的模型总是优于假设迁移率相等的模型。通过纳入这种异质性,得到最佳支持的情景是,自分化以来的前三分之二时间内处于长期异域隔离状态,随后在最后四分之一时间内发生二次接触和基因渗入。相比之下,将迁移限制为同质未能区分所测试的任何不同基因流模型。因此,我们的模拟为欧洲贻贝杂交带的二次接触情景提供了统计支持,而标准的溯祖方法未能证实这一点。我们的结果表明,基因渗入率的基因组变异可能对从推断方法得出的生物学结论产生深远影响,需要在未来的研究中加以考虑。