Faruqi Nighat, Lloyd Jane, Ahmad Raghib, Yeong Lin-Lee, Harris Mark
Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(3):321-6. doi: 10.1071/PY14061.
The objective of the study was to explore the feasibility of an intervention that enhances preventive care for primary care patients with low health literacy. A mixed method study was conducted in four Sydney general practices in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage. The intervention included screening for low health literacy in patients aged 40-69 years, clinical record audits of care for prevention of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and provider training and meetings. Surveys and interviews were conducted to identify providers' approaches to, and delivery of, preventive care for people with low health literacy. Our study found variable response rates and prevalence of low health literacy. Of the eligible patients screened, 29% had low health literacy. Providers described three approaches to preventive care, which remained largely unchanged. However, they demonstrated recognition of the importance of better communication and referral support for patients with low health literacy. Fewer patients with low health literacy were identified than expected. Despite improved awareness of the need for better communication, there was limited evidence of change in providers' approach to providing preventive care, suggesting a need for more attention towards providers' attitudes to support these patients.
该研究的目的是探讨一种干预措施的可行性,该干预措施旨在加强对健康素养较低的初级保健患者的预防保健。在悉尼四个社会经济条件不利地区的普通诊所开展了一项混合方法研究。干预措施包括对40至69岁患者进行健康素养低下筛查、对糖尿病和心血管疾病预防护理的临床记录审核,以及提供者培训和会议。通过调查和访谈来确定提供者对健康素养较低人群的预防保健方法和提供方式。我们的研究发现,健康素养低下的反应率和患病率各不相同。在接受筛查的符合条件的患者中,29%的人健康素养较低。提供者描述了三种预防保健方法,这些方法基本保持不变。然而,他们认识到了更好地与健康素养较低的患者沟通和提供转诊支持的重要性。被识别出的健康素养较低的患者比预期的要少。尽管对更好沟通的必要性的认识有所提高,但几乎没有证据表明提供者提供预防保健的方式有所改变,这表明需要更多关注提供者对支持这些患者的态度。