• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二甲双胍联合胰岛素与磺脲类药物强化治疗与糖尿病患者心血管事件及全因死亡率之间的关联。

Association between intensification of metformin treatment with insulin vs sulfonylureas and cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes.

作者信息

Roumie Christianne L, Greevy Robert A, Grijalva Carlos G, Hung Adriana M, Liu Xulei, Murff Harvey J, Elasy Tom A, Griffin Marie R

机构信息

Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, HSR&D Center, Nashville, Tennessee2Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, HSR&D Center, Nashville, Tennessee3Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2288-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4312.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.4312
PMID:24915260
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4149288/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Preferred second-line medication for diabetes treatment after metformin failure remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To compare time to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, or death in a cohort of metformin initiators who added insulin or a sulfonylurea.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort constructed with national Veterans Health Administration, Medicare, and National Death Index databases. The study population comprised veterans initially treated with metformin from 2001 through 2008 who subsequently added either insulin or sulfonylurea. Propensity score matching on characteristics was performed, matching each participant who added insulin to 5 who added a sulfonylurea. Patients were followed through September 2011 for primary analyses or September 2009 for cause-of-death analyses.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Risk of a composite outcome of AMI, stroke hospitalization, or all-cause death was compared between therapies with marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for baseline and time-varying demographics, medications, cholesterol level, hemoglobin A1c level, creatinine level, blood pressure, body mass index, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 178,341 metformin monotherapy patients, 2948 added insulin and 39,990 added a sulfonylurea. Propensity score matching yielded 2436 metformin + insulin and 12,180 metformin + sulfonylurea patients. At intensification, patients had received metformin for a median of 14 months (IQR, 5-30), and hemoglobin A1c level was 8.1% (IQR, 7.2%-9.9%). Median follow-up after intensification was 14 months (IQR, 6-29 months). There were 172 vs 634 events for the primary outcome among patients who added insulin vs sulfonylureas, respectively (42.7 vs 32.8 events per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.58; P = .009). Acute myocardial infarction and stroke rates were statistically similar, 41 vs 229 events (10.2 and 11.9 events per 1000 person-years; aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.30; P = .52), whereas all-cause death rates were 137 vs 444 events, respectively (33.7 and 22.7 events per 1000 person-years; aHR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.15-1.79; P = .001). There were 54 vs 258 secondary outcomes: AMI, stroke hospitalizations, or cardiovascular deaths (22.8 vs 22.5 events per 1000 person-years; aHR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.71-1.34; P = .87).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with diabetes who were receiving metformin, the addition of insulin vs a sulfonylurea was associated with an increased risk of a composite of nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. These findings require further investigation to understand risks associated with insulin use in these patients.

摘要

重要性

二甲双胍治疗失败后糖尿病二线治疗的首选药物仍不明确。

目的

比较在添加胰岛素或磺脲类药物的二甲双胍起始治疗队列中发生急性心肌梗死(AMI)、中风或死亡的时间。

设计、设置和参与者:利用退伍军人健康管理局、医疗保险和国家死亡指数数据库构建回顾性队列。研究人群包括2001年至2008年最初接受二甲双胍治疗、随后添加胰岛素或磺脲类药物的退伍军人。根据特征进行倾向评分匹配,将每例添加胰岛素的参与者与5例添加磺脲类药物的参与者进行匹配。对患者随访至2011年9月进行主要分析,或至2009年9月进行死因分析。

主要结局和测量指标

采用边际结构Cox比例风险模型比较两种治疗方法中AMI、中风住院或全因死亡复合结局的风险,该模型对基线和随时间变化的人口统计学、药物治疗、胆固醇水平、糖化血红蛋白水平、肌酐水平、血压、体重指数和合并症进行了调整。

结果

在178,341例二甲双胍单药治疗患者中,2948例添加了胰岛素,39,990例添加了磺脲类药物。倾向评分匹配产生了2436例二甲双胍+胰岛素患者和12,180例二甲双胍+磺脲类药物患者。强化治疗时,患者接受二甲双胍治疗的中位时间为14个月(四分位间距,5 - 30个月),糖化血红蛋白水平为8.1%(四分位间距,7.2% - 9.9%)。强化治疗后的中位随访时间为14个月(四分位间距,6 - 29个月)。添加胰岛素与添加磺脲类药物的患者中,主要结局事件分别为172例和634例(每1000人年42.7例和32.8例;调整后风险比[aHR],1.30;95%置信区间,1.07 - 1.58;P = 0.009)。急性心肌梗死和中风发生率在统计学上相似,分别为41例和229例(每1000人年10.2例和11.9例;aHR,0.88;95%置信区间,0.59 - 1.30;P = 0.52),而全因死亡率分别为137例和444例(每1000人年33.7例和22.7例;aHR,1.44;95%置信区间,1.15 - 1.79;P = 0.001)。次要结局有54例和258例:AMI、中风住院或心血管死亡(每1000人年22.8例和22.5例;aHR,0.98;95%置信区间,0.71 - 1.34;P = 0.87)。

结论及相关性

在接受二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者中,添加胰岛素与添加磺脲类药物相比,非致命心血管结局和全因死亡率复合结局的风险增加。这些发现需要进一步研究以了解这些患者使用胰岛素相关的风险。

相似文献

1
Association between intensification of metformin treatment with insulin vs sulfonylureas and cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality among patients with diabetes.二甲双胍联合胰岛素与磺脲类药物强化治疗与糖尿病患者心血管事件及全因死亡率之间的关联。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2288-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4312.
2
Risk of hypoglycemia following intensification of metformin treatment with insulin versus sulfonylurea.与磺脲类药物相比,胰岛素强化二甲双胍治疗后发生低血糖的风险。
CMAJ. 2016 Apr 5;188(6):E104-E112. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150904. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylurea and metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍单药治疗 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件的效果比较:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):601-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00003.
4
Comparative Safety of Sulfonylurea and Metformin Monotherapy on the Risk of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study.磺脲类药物与二甲双胍单药治疗对心力衰竭风险的比较安全性:一项队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 19;6(4):e005379. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005379.
5
Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Line Agents for the Treatment of Diabetes Type 2 in Preventing Kidney Function Decline.二线药物治疗2型糖尿病在预防肾功能下降方面的比较疗效
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Dec 7;11(12):2177-2185. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02630316. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Sulfonylureas as initial treatment for type 2 diabetes and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: A population-based cohort study.磺酰脲类药物作为 2 型糖尿病的初始治疗与不良心血管事件风险:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;85(10):2378-2389. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14056. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
7
The effects of dual-therapy intensification with insulin or dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.胰岛素或二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂双重治疗强化对2型糖尿病患者心血管事件及全因死亡率的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2017 Jul;14(4):295-303. doi: 10.1177/1479164116687102. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
Intensification with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, insulin, or thiazolidinediones and risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and severe hypoglycemia in patients on metformin-sulfonylurea dual therapy: A retrospective cohort study.在二甲双胍-磺酰脲类双重疗法的患者中,强化使用二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂、胰岛素或噻唑烷二酮类药物与全因死亡率、心血管疾病和严重低血糖的风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Dec 26;16(12):e1002999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002999. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with insulin versus glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病中使用胰岛素与胰高血糖素样肽-1类似物的心血管事件及全因死亡率
Heart. 2016 Oct 1;102(19):1581-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309164. Epub 2016 May 23.
10
Combination therapy with metformin plus sulphonylureas versus metformin plus DPP-4 inhibitors: association with major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.二甲双胍联合磺脲类药物与二甲双胍联合二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂的联合治疗:与主要不良心血管事件及全因死亡率的关联
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Oct;16(10):977-83. doi: 10.1111/dom.12306. Epub 2014 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of nonrefractive visual impairment with risk of all-cause and specific-cause mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999 to 2008.1999年至2008年美国国家健康与营养检查调查中,非屈光性视力损害与全因死亡率及特定病因死亡率风险的关联
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 24;25(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22249-7.
2
Is fluid retention a cardiovascular risk factor?体液潴留是否是心血管风险因素?
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2024;88(2):277-288. doi: 10.3233/CH-242128.
3
Modern-Day Therapeutics and Ongoing Clinical Trials against Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Service utilization of veterans dually eligible for VA and Medicare fee-for-service: 1999-2004.1999 - 2004年同时符合退伍军人事务部(VA)和医疗保险服务收费条件的退伍军人的服务利用情况。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Oct 19;2(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.03.a06. eCollection 2012.
2
Validation of VA administrative data algorithms for identifying cardiovascular disease hospitalization.用于识别心血管疾病住院情况的退伍军人事务部行政数据算法的验证
Epidemiology. 2013 Mar;24(2):334-5. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182821e75.
3
Mortality and other important diabetes-related outcomes with insulin vs other antihyperglycemic therapies in type 2 diabetes.
现代治疗方法与2型糖尿病的正在进行的临床试验:一项叙述性综述
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2025;21(6):59-74. doi: 10.2174/0115733998294919240506044544.
4
Association of diabetic retinopathy on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in older adults with diabetes: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2008.糖尿病视网膜病变与老年糖尿病患者全因和死因特异性死亡率的关系:2005-2008 年全国健康和营养调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 7;14(1):10458. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58502-z.
5
Residual risk of cardiovascular complications in statin-using patients with type 2 diabetes: the Taiwan Diabetes Registry Study.他汀类药物治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者心血管并发症残留风险:台湾糖尿病登记研究。
Lipids Health Dis. 2024 Jan 23;23(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12944-023-02001-z.
6
Association of retinopathy with risk of all-cause and specific-cause mortality in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005 to 2008.2005 至 2008 年全国健康与营养调查中视网膜病变与全因和特定原因死亡率的关系。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 23;11:1200925. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1200925. eCollection 2023.
7
Quality of observational studies of clinical interventions: a meta-epidemiological review.临床干预措施的观察性研究质量:一项Meta 流行病学评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 7;22(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01797-1.
8
Prescriber Uncertainty as Opportunity to Improve Care of Type 2 Diabetes with Chronic Kidney Disease: Mixed Methods Study.《机遇与挑战并存:利用医师不确定性改善慢性肾脏病合并 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗》混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(6):1476-1483. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07838-1. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
9
Cardiovascular risk of gabapentin and pregabalin in patients with diabetic neuropathy.糖尿病周围神经病变患者应用加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林的心血管风险。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Sep 1;21(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01610-9.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis of Dapagliflozin Compared to Sulfonylureas for Type 2 Diabetes as Second-Line Treatment in Indian Healthcare Payer's Perspective.从印度医疗保健支付方角度比较达格列净与磺脲类药物作为二线治疗药物用于2型糖尿病的成本-效用分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Oct 22;13:897-907. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S328433. eCollection 2021.
在 2 型糖尿病中,胰岛素与其他抗高血糖药物治疗的死亡率和其他重要的糖尿病相关结局。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Feb;98(2):668-77. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3042. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
4
Comparative effectiveness of sulfonylurea and metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study.磺酰脲类药物和二甲双胍单药治疗 2 型糖尿病患者心血管事件的效果比较:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Nov 6;157(9):601-10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-9-201211060-00003.
5
β-cell function preservation after 3.5 years of intensive diabetes therapy.强化糖尿病治疗 3.5 年后的β细胞功能保存。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jul;35(7):1406-12. doi: 10.2337/dc11-2170.
6
Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia.基础胰岛素与糖调节受损患者的心血管及其他结局。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 26;367(4):319-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203858. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
7
Severe hypoglycemia symptoms, antecedent behaviors, immediate consequences and association with glycemia medication usage: Secondary analysis of the ACCORD clinical trial data.严重低血糖症状、前驱行为、即刻后果及其与血糖药物使用的关系:ACCORD 临床试验数据的二次分析。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2012 May 30;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-12-5.
8
Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2型糖尿病高血糖管理:以患者为中心的方法:美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)的立场声明
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jun;35(6):1364-79. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0413. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
9
Initiation of sulfonylureas versus metformin is associated with higher blood pressure at one year.起始磺酰脲类药物与二甲双胍治疗与一年时的更高血压相关。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 May;21(5):515-23. doi: 10.1002/pds.3249. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Comparative effectiveness of incident oral antidiabetic drugs on kidney function.口服降糖药对肾功能影响的比较效果。
Kidney Int. 2012 Apr;81(7):698-706. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.444. Epub 2012 Jan 18.