Roumie Christianne L, Greevy Robert A, Grijalva Carlos G, Hung Adriana M, Liu Xulei, Murff Harvey J, Elasy Tom A, Griffin Marie R
Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, HSR&D Center, Nashville, Tennessee2Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, HSR&D Center, Nashville, Tennessee3Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA. 2014 Jun 11;311(22):2288-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4312.
Preferred second-line medication for diabetes treatment after metformin failure remains uncertain.
To compare time to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, or death in a cohort of metformin initiators who added insulin or a sulfonylurea.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort constructed with national Veterans Health Administration, Medicare, and National Death Index databases. The study population comprised veterans initially treated with metformin from 2001 through 2008 who subsequently added either insulin or sulfonylurea. Propensity score matching on characteristics was performed, matching each participant who added insulin to 5 who added a sulfonylurea. Patients were followed through September 2011 for primary analyses or September 2009 for cause-of-death analyses.
Risk of a composite outcome of AMI, stroke hospitalization, or all-cause death was compared between therapies with marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for baseline and time-varying demographics, medications, cholesterol level, hemoglobin A1c level, creatinine level, blood pressure, body mass index, and comorbidities.
Among 178,341 metformin monotherapy patients, 2948 added insulin and 39,990 added a sulfonylurea. Propensity score matching yielded 2436 metformin + insulin and 12,180 metformin + sulfonylurea patients. At intensification, patients had received metformin for a median of 14 months (IQR, 5-30), and hemoglobin A1c level was 8.1% (IQR, 7.2%-9.9%). Median follow-up after intensification was 14 months (IQR, 6-29 months). There were 172 vs 634 events for the primary outcome among patients who added insulin vs sulfonylureas, respectively (42.7 vs 32.8 events per 1000 person-years; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.07-1.58; P = .009). Acute myocardial infarction and stroke rates were statistically similar, 41 vs 229 events (10.2 and 11.9 events per 1000 person-years; aHR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.59-1.30; P = .52), whereas all-cause death rates were 137 vs 444 events, respectively (33.7 and 22.7 events per 1000 person-years; aHR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.15-1.79; P = .001). There were 54 vs 258 secondary outcomes: AMI, stroke hospitalizations, or cardiovascular deaths (22.8 vs 22.5 events per 1000 person-years; aHR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.71-1.34; P = .87).
Among patients with diabetes who were receiving metformin, the addition of insulin vs a sulfonylurea was associated with an increased risk of a composite of nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality. These findings require further investigation to understand risks associated with insulin use in these patients.
二甲双胍治疗失败后糖尿病二线治疗的首选药物仍不明确。
比较在添加胰岛素或磺脲类药物的二甲双胍起始治疗队列中发生急性心肌梗死(AMI)、中风或死亡的时间。
设计、设置和参与者:利用退伍军人健康管理局、医疗保险和国家死亡指数数据库构建回顾性队列。研究人群包括2001年至2008年最初接受二甲双胍治疗、随后添加胰岛素或磺脲类药物的退伍军人。根据特征进行倾向评分匹配,将每例添加胰岛素的参与者与5例添加磺脲类药物的参与者进行匹配。对患者随访至2011年9月进行主要分析,或至2009年9月进行死因分析。
采用边际结构Cox比例风险模型比较两种治疗方法中AMI、中风住院或全因死亡复合结局的风险,该模型对基线和随时间变化的人口统计学、药物治疗、胆固醇水平、糖化血红蛋白水平、肌酐水平、血压、体重指数和合并症进行了调整。
在178,341例二甲双胍单药治疗患者中,2948例添加了胰岛素,39,990例添加了磺脲类药物。倾向评分匹配产生了2436例二甲双胍+胰岛素患者和12,180例二甲双胍+磺脲类药物患者。强化治疗时,患者接受二甲双胍治疗的中位时间为14个月(四分位间距,5 - 30个月),糖化血红蛋白水平为8.1%(四分位间距,7.2% - 9.9%)。强化治疗后的中位随访时间为14个月(四分位间距,6 - 29个月)。添加胰岛素与添加磺脲类药物的患者中,主要结局事件分别为172例和634例(每1000人年42.7例和32.8例;调整后风险比[aHR],1.30;95%置信区间,1.07 - 1.58;P = 0.009)。急性心肌梗死和中风发生率在统计学上相似,分别为41例和229例(每1000人年10.2例和11.9例;aHR,0.88;95%置信区间,0.59 - 1.30;P = 0.52),而全因死亡率分别为137例和444例(每1000人年33.7例和22.7例;aHR,1.44;95%置信区间,1.15 - 1.79;P = 0.001)。次要结局有54例和258例:AMI、中风住院或心血管死亡(每1000人年22.8例和22.5例;aHR,0.98;95%置信区间,0.71 - 1.34;P = 0.87)。
在接受二甲双胍治疗的糖尿病患者中,添加胰岛素与添加磺脲类药物相比,非致命心血管结局和全因死亡率复合结局的风险增加。这些发现需要进一步研究以了解这些患者使用胰岛素相关的风险。