• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《多伦多疼痛管理量表-急性冠状动脉综合征版本》的内容效度

Content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-Acute Coronary Syndrome Version.

作者信息

O'Keefe-McCarthy Sheila, McGillion Michael, Nelson Sioban, Clarke Sean, McFetridge-Durdle Judith, Watt-Watson Judy

出版信息

Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Spring;24(2):11-8.

PMID:24915664
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac pain and/or discomfort arising from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) can often be severe and anxiety-provoking. Cardiac pain, a symptom of impaired myocardial perfusion, if left untreated, may lead to further myocardial hypoxia, which can potentiate myocardial damage. Evidence suggests that once ACS patients are stabilized, their pain may not be adequately assessed. Lack of knowledge and problematic beliefs about pain may contribute to this problem. To date, no standardized tools are available to examine nurses' specific knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain that could inform future educational initiatives.

AIM

To examine the content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-ACS Version (TPMI-ACS), a 24-item tool designed to assess nurses' knowledge and beliefs about ACS pain assessment and management.

METHODS

Eight clinical and scientific experts rated the relevance of each item using a four-point scale. A content validity index was computed for each item (I-CVI), as well as the total scale, expressed as the mean item CVI (S-CVI/AVE). Items with an I-CVI > or = 0.7 were retained, items with an I-CVI ranging from 0.5-0.7 were revised and clarified, and items with an I-CVI < or = 0.5 were discarded.

RESULTS

I-CVIs ranged from 0.5-1.0 and the S-CVI/AVE was 0.90, reflecting high inter-rater agreement across items. The least relevant item was eliminated.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary content validity was established on the TPMI-ACS version. All items retained in the TPMI-ACS version met requirements for content validity. Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the TPMI-ACS is needed to establish criterion and construct validity, as well as reliability indicators.

摘要

背景

急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)引发的心脏疼痛和/或不适通常较为严重且会引发焦虑。心脏疼痛是心肌灌注受损的症状,若不治疗,可能会导致进一步的心肌缺氧,进而加重心肌损伤。有证据表明,ACS患者病情稳定后,其疼痛可能未得到充分评估。对疼痛的认知不足和存在问题的观念可能导致了这一问题。迄今为止,尚无标准化工具可用于检验护士关于ACS疼痛的具体知识和观念,而这些知识和观念可为未来的教育举措提供参考。

目的

检验多伦多疼痛管理量表-ACS版(TPMI-ACS)的内容效度,该量表为一个包含24个条目的工具,旨在评估护士对ACS疼痛评估和管理的知识与观念。

方法

八位临床和科学专家使用四点量表对每个条目的相关性进行评分。计算每个条目的内容效度指数(I-CVI)以及总量表的内容效度指数,以平均条目CVI(S-CVI/AVE)表示。I-CVI≥0.7的条目予以保留,I-CVI在0.5-0.7之间的条目进行修订和澄清,I-CVI≤0.5的条目予以舍弃。

结果

I-CVI范围为0.5-1.0,S-CVI/AVE为0.90,表明各条目间评分者信度较高。最不相关的条目被剔除。

结论

TPMI-ACS版初步建立了内容效度。TPMI-ACS版中保留的所有条目均符合内容效度要求。需要对TPMI-ACS的心理测量特性进行进一步评估,以确立效标效度和结构效度以及信度指标。

相似文献

1
Content validity of the Toronto Pain Management Inventory-Acute Coronary Syndrome Version.《多伦多疼痛管理量表-急性冠状动脉综合征版本》的内容效度
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Spring;24(2):11-8.
2
Pain and Anxiety in Rural Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Awaiting Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization.等待诊断性心脏导管插入术的农村急性冠状动脉综合征患者的疼痛与焦虑
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):546-57. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000203.
3
Content Validity and Psychometric Characteristics of the "Knowledge about Older Patients Quiz" for Nurses Using Item Response Theory.基于项目反应理论的护士“老年患者知识测验”的内容效度和心理测量学特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Nov;64(11):2378-2383. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14476. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
4
Evaluating the content validity of two versions of an instrument used in measuring pediatric pain knowledge and attitudes in the Ghanaian context.评估两种用于衡量加纳儿科疼痛知识和态度的工具版本的内容效度。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):e0241983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241983. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychometric evaluation of the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Response Index.急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)反应指数的心理测量评估。
Res Nurs Health. 2007 Dec;30(6):584-94. doi: 10.1002/nur.20213.
6
Validity and reliability of an oral care practice survey for the orally intubated adult critically ill patient.针对成年口腔插管重症患者的口腔护理实践调查的效度和信度。
Nurs Res. 2009 Sep-Oct;58(5):374-7. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181b4b3d1.
7
Nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards aged sexuality: validity and internal consistency of the Dutch version of the Aging Sexual Knowledge and Attitudes Scale.护士对老年人性行为的知识和态度:荷兰版老龄化性知识和态度量表的效度和内部一致性。
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Nov;69(11):2584-96. doi: 10.1111/jan.12113. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
8
The cognitive risk profile for pain: development of a self-report inventory for identifying beliefs and attitudes that interfere with pain management.疼痛的认知风险概况:开发一种自我报告量表,用于识别干扰疼痛管理的信念和态度。
Clin J Pain. 2006 May;22(4):332-45. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000209801.78043.91.
9
[Content validity index in scale development].[量表编制中的内容效度指数]
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2012 Feb;37(2):152-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
10
Instrument validation process: a case study using the Paediatric Pain Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire.仪器验证过程:使用《儿科疼痛知识与态度问卷》的案例研究
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jun;25(11-12):1566-75. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13130. Epub 2016 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric testing of the support and control in birth scale.生育支持与控制量表的心理计量学测试。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 14;20(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02888-x.