Meijer Ewout H, klein Selle Nathalie, Elber Lotem, Ben-Shakhar Gershon
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Psychophysiology. 2014 Sep;51(9):879-904. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12239. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
The Concealed Information Test (CIT) uses psychophysiological measures to determine the presence or absence of crime-related information in a suspect's memory. We conducted a meta-analysis on the validity of the CIT based on four physiological measures-skin conductance response (SCR), respiration line length (RLL), changes in heart rate (HR), and enhanced amplitudes of the P300 component of the event-related potential (P300). This meta-analysis relied on laboratory studies that used either the mock-crime or the personal-item paradigm. Results showed a mean effect size (d*) of 1.55 for SCR, 1.11 for RLL, 0.89 for HR, and 1.89 for P300. However, P300 outperformed SCR only in the personal-item paradigm, but not in the mock-crime paradigm. Motivation level, number of questions, publication year, and the inclusion of innocent participants emerged as significant moderators for the SCR, while only the type of paradigm used moderated the P300 effect.
隐蔽信息测试（CIT）使用心理生理测量方法来确定犯罪嫌疑人记忆中是否存在与犯罪相关的信息。我们基于四种生理测量指标——皮肤电反应（SCR）、呼吸线长度（RLL）、心率变化（HR）和事件相关电位P300成分的增强幅度（P300），对CIT的有效性进行了荟萃分析。这项荟萃分析依赖于使用模拟犯罪或个人物品范式的实验室研究。结果显示，SCR的平均效应量（d*）为1.55，RLL为1.11，HR为0.89，P300为1.89。然而，P300仅在个人物品范式中表现优于SCR，在模拟犯罪范式中则不然。动机水平、问题数量、出版年份以及是否纳入无辜参与者是SCR的显著调节因素，而只有所使用的范式类型调节了P300效应。
