• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰勒·斯威夫特(Taylor Swift)在基于反应时间的隐藏信息测试中并未提高人脸识别能力:目标熟悉度效应的研究。

Taylor Swift does not boost face recognition in reaction time-based Concealed Information Test: investigating target-familiarity effects.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2292-2302. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02003-1. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-024-02003-1
PMID:39230760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522165/
Abstract

Eyewitness identifications from lineups are prone to error. More indirect identification procedures, such as the reaction-time based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) could be a viable alternative to lineups. The RT-CIT uses response times to assess facial familiarity. Theory and initial evidence with autobiographical stimuli suggests that the accuracy of RT-CIT can be augmented when participants' reliance on familiarity-based responding increases. We tested this assumption in two pre-registered experiments with 173 participants. Participants witnessed a mock crime. In the subsequent RT-CIT protocol, participants reacted to probe faces from the mock crime video, to irrelevant faces, and to target faces that required a unique response. Targets were either unknown people or were well-known celebrities (e.g., Taylor Swift). As expected, reaction times were longer to probes than to irrelevants in all conditions, indicating a CIT effect. Contrasting our pre-registered predictions, the CIT effect was not larger in the familiar condition (Experiment 1: unfamiliar targets: d = 0.77 vs. celebrity targets: d = 0.24; Experiment 2: unfamiliar targets: d = 1.09 vs. celebrity targets: d = 0.79). This suggests that familiar targets did not increase the validity of the RT-CIT in diagnosing concealed face recognition. A potential lack of saliency of the familiar targets might explain these unexpected findings. Of note, we did find medium to large effect sizes overall, speaking to the potential of diagnosing face recognition with the RT-CIT.

摘要

目击证人辨认容易出错。更间接的识别程序,如基于反应时间的隐藏信息测试 (RT-CIT),可能是替代列队辨认的可行方法。RT-CIT 使用反应时间来评估面部熟悉度。基于自传体刺激的理论和初步证据表明,当参与者更多地依赖熟悉度反应时,RT-CIT 的准确性可以提高。我们在两个有 173 名参与者的预先注册实验中检验了这一假设。参与者目击了一起模拟犯罪。在随后的 RT-CIT 协议中,参与者对模拟犯罪视频中的探针面孔、不相关的面孔和需要独特反应的目标面孔做出反应。目标是未知的人或知名的名人(例如,泰勒·斯威夫特)。正如预期的那样,在所有条件下,探针的反应时间都比不相关的反应时间长,这表明存在 CIT 效应。与我们预先注册的预测相反,在熟悉的条件下 CIT 效应并没有更大(实验 1:不熟悉的目标:d=0.77 与名人目标:d=0.24;实验 2:不熟悉的目标:d=1.09 与名人目标:d=0.79)。这表明熟悉的目标并没有增加 RT-CIT 诊断隐藏面部识别的有效性。熟悉目标的潜在缺乏显著性可能解释了这些出乎意料的发现。值得注意的是,我们总体上确实发现了中等至大的效应大小,这表明 RT-CIT 有诊断面部识别的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bb/11522165/2e552b46c54b/426_2024_2003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bb/11522165/845f6691ba28/426_2024_2003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bb/11522165/2e552b46c54b/426_2024_2003_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bb/11522165/845f6691ba28/426_2024_2003_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35bb/11522165/2e552b46c54b/426_2024_2003_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Taylor Swift does not boost face recognition in reaction time-based Concealed Information Test: investigating target-familiarity effects.泰勒·斯威夫特(Taylor Swift)在基于反应时间的隐藏信息测试中并未提高人脸识别能力:目标熟悉度效应的研究。
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov;88(8):2292-2302. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02003-1. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Deleterious effects of probe-related versus irrelevant targets on the "CIT effect" in the P300- and RT-based three-stimulus protocol for detection of concealed information.在基于 P300 和 RT 的三刺激协议中,检测隐藏信息时,探针相关目标与不相关目标对“CIT 效应”的有害影响。
Psychophysiology. 2019 Dec;56(12):e13459. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13459. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
Reaction time-based Concealed Information Test in eyewitness identification is moderated by picture similarity but not eyewitness cooperation.基于反应时的目击证人辨认中的隐藏信息测试受图片相似性的调节,但不受目击证人合作的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2278-2288. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1139-8. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time‑based Concealed Information Test: the effect of viewpoint congruency between test and encoding.基于反应时的隐蔽信息测试对目击证人辨认的诊断:测试和编码时视角一致性的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):639-651. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01857-1. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
5
Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time-based concealed information test: the effect of observation time.基于反应时的隐藏信息测试对目击证人辨认的诊断:观察时间的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01643-5. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
6
Testing a potential alternative to traditional identification procedures: Reaction time-based concealed information test does not work for lineups with cooperative witnesses.测试一种潜在的替代传统识别程序的方法:基于反应时间的隐藏信息测试不适用于有合作证人的列队辨认。
Psychol Res. 2019 Sep;83(6):1210-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0948-5. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
7
Variation of picture angles and its effect on the Concealed Information Test.图片角度的变化及其对隐藏信息测试的影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Jul 31;5(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00233-6.
8
Seen this scene? Scene recognition in the reaction-time Concealed Information Test.见过这种场景吗?反应时隐藏信息测试中的场景识别。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Nov;48(8):1388-1402. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01063-z.
9
The effect of retroactive memory interference on the P300-based Complex Trial Protocol (CTP).回溯记忆干扰对基于 P300 的复杂试验协议 (CTP) 的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2020 Jan;147:213-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.10.016. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
10
Using more different and more familiar targets improves the detection of concealed information.使用更多不同且更熟悉的目标可提高对隐藏信息的检测。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time‑based Concealed Information Test: the effect of viewpoint congruency between test and encoding.基于反应时的隐蔽信息测试对目击证人辨认的诊断:测试和编码时视角一致性的影响。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):639-651. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01857-1. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
2
Assessing partial errors via analog gaming keyboards in response conflict tasks: A proof-of-concept study with the concealed information test.通过响应冲突任务中的模拟游戏键盘评估部分错误:使用隐藏信息测试的概念验证研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Jan;56(1):278-289. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02039-4. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
3
Diagnosing eyewitness identifications with reaction time-based concealed information test: the effect of observation time.
基于反应时的隐藏信息测试对目击证人辨认的诊断:观察时间的影响。
Psychol Res. 2023 Feb;87(1):281-293. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01643-5. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence.收集和保存目击证人辨认证据的政策和程序建议。
Law Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;44(1):3-36. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000359.
5
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015.评估 2010 年至 2015 年期间《自然》和《科学》杂志上社会科学实验的可重复性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z. Epub 2018 Aug 27.
6
Reaction time-based Concealed Information Test in eyewitness identification is moderated by picture similarity but not eyewitness cooperation.基于反应时的目击证人辨认中的隐藏信息测试受图片相似性的调节,但不受目击证人合作的影响。
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2278-2288. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1139-8. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Using more different and more familiar targets improves the detection of concealed information.使用更多不同且更熟悉的目标可提高对隐藏信息的检测。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Apr;185:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
8
Testing a potential alternative to traditional identification procedures: Reaction time-based concealed information test does not work for lineups with cooperative witnesses.测试一种潜在的替代传统识别程序的方法:基于反应时间的隐藏信息测试不适用于有合作证人的列队辨认。
Psychol Res. 2019 Sep;83(6):1210-1222. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0948-5. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception.说谎需要时间:关于说谎反应时测谎的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Apr;143(4):428-453. doi: 10.1037/bul0000087. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
10
Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.跨生命周期的目击证人识别:年龄差异的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2015 Nov;141(6):1228-65. doi: 10.1037/bul0000013. Epub 2015 May 25.