• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用密闭式药物转移装置时环磷酰胺制备时间和成本降低的验证]

[Verification of reduction in preparation time and cost of cyclophosphamide when using the closed-system drug transfer device].

作者信息

Ikeno Yohei, Arii Daisuke, Nakajima Hirofumi, Murooka Kunihiko, Nojima Michio, Kidokoro Akio

机构信息

Dept. of Pharmacy,aculty of Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital.

出版信息

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 May;41(5):611-5.

PMID:24917007
Abstract

The closed-system transfer device (CSTD), which is used to prevent the exposure of medical staff to anticancer drugs, has been reported to allow safe preparation and administration of these drugs to patients. At many medical institutions, however, the use of such devices is limited to select anticancer drugs. This could be attributable to the longer preparation time compared to the conventional injection technique with a syringe and needle, as well as the fact that the anticancer drugs are too expensive to be covered by the remuneration available for medical services. Against this background, we measured the time required to prepare cyclophosphamide(CPA)and estimated the cost incurred. Our results indicated that the preparation time for either a single dose of 100 mg CPA or a combination of 100 mg CPA and 500 mg of another drug(100mg+500 mg group)was significantly longer than that for 500 mg of a single drug. On the other hand, use of a CSTD reduced the total cost (drug cost+CSTD cost)on switching to a single dose of 500 mg, resulting in a 5-year savings as follows: 3,755,217 yen for ChemoCLAVE®, 6,302,622 yen for PhaSeal®, and 2,698,451 yen for Chemosafe®. These findings suggest that the appropriate selection of drugs, including a large standard dose of CPA, allows shortened preparation time and reduced total drug cost as well as CSTD cost.

摘要

用于防止医护人员接触抗癌药物的密闭式转移装置(CSTD),已被报道能够安全地为患者配制和使用这些药物。然而,在许多医疗机构,此类装置的使用仅限于某些抗癌药物。这可能是由于与传统的注射器和针头注射技术相比,其配制时间更长,以及抗癌药物过于昂贵,医疗服务的报酬无法覆盖。在此背景下,我们测量了配制环磷酰胺(CPA)所需的时间并估算了成本。我们的结果表明,单剂量100mg CPA或100mg CPA与500mg另一种药物组合(100mg + 500mg组)的配制时间明显长于单剂量500mg单一药物的配制时间。另一方面,使用CSTD可降低转换为单剂量500mg时的总成本(药物成本 + CSTD成本),5年节省如下:ChemoCLAVE®为3,755,217日元,PhaSeal®为6,302,622日元,Chemosafe®为2,698,451日元。这些发现表明,包括大标准剂量CPA在内的药物的适当选择,可缩短配制时间,降低总药物成本以及CSTD成本。

相似文献

1
[Verification of reduction in preparation time and cost of cyclophosphamide when using the closed-system drug transfer device].[使用密闭式药物转移装置时环磷酰胺制备时间和成本降低的验证]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 May;41(5):611-5.
2
[Examination of Actual Medical Material Cost and Cost Reduction Related to Exposure Prevention in the Preparation of Anticancer Drugs].[抗癌药物制备中实际医疗材料成本及与暴露预防相关的成本降低情况调查]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2019 Aug;46(8):1281-1286.
3
Cost savings realized by use of the PhaSeal(®) closed-system transfer device for preparation of antineoplastic agents.使用PhaSeal(®)封闭系统转移装置制备抗肿瘤药物所实现的成本节约。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2013 Dec;19(4):338-47. doi: 10.1177/1078155213499387. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
4
Cost Analysis of Using a Closed-System Transfer Device (CSTD) for Antineoplastic Drug preparation in a Malaysian Government-Funded Hospital.马来西亚一家政府资助医院使用封闭系统转移装置(CSTD)进行抗肿瘤药物配制的成本分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):4951-4957. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.4951.
5
Development of a closed drug preparation method for oral anticancer drugs.口服抗癌药物封闭制剂方法的研发。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2013 Dec;19(4):315-20. doi: 10.1177/1078155212467554. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
6
Comparison of surface contamination with cyclophosphamide and fluorouracil using a closed-system drug transfer device versus standard preparation techniques.使用密闭系统药物转移装置与标准配制技术比较环磷酰胺和氟尿嘧啶的表面污染情况。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006 Sep 15;63(18):1736-44. doi: 10.2146/ajhp050258.
7
Use of a closed system device to reduce occupational contamination and exposure to antineoplastic drugs in the hospital work environment.在医院工作环境中使用封闭系统设备以减少职业性污染和抗肿瘤药物暴露。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Mar;53(2):153-60. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men081.
8
[Effect of Increased Use of a Closed System Drug Transfer Device and Simplification of Personal Protective Equipment on the Cost of Medical Materials].[增加使用密闭式药物转移装置及简化个人防护装备对医疗材料成本的影响]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2021 Jul;48(7):927-931.
9
Anticancer drug waste minimization and cost-saving study by using a closed-system transfer device for chemotherapy compounding.使用封闭系统转移装置进行化疗药物配制以实现抗癌药物废物最小化和成本节约的研究。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Apr;28(3):605-612. doi: 10.1177/10781552211008527. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
10
Reducing workplace cytotoxic surface contamination using a closed-system drug transfer device.使用封闭系统药物转移装置减少工作场所细胞毒性表面污染。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2010 Mar;16(1):19-25. doi: 10.1177/1078155209352543. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Puncture Devices on the Accuracy of Cyclophosphamide Dosing for Chemotherapy Administration.穿刺装置对化疗给药中 cyclophosphamide 剂量准确性的影响。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;18(6):879. doi: 10.3390/ph18060879.
2
Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.封闭系统药物转移装置加危险药物安全操作与仅进行安全操作相比,对减少医护人员接触输注性危险药物的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD012860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012860.pub2.
3
Effectiveness of a Closed-System Transfer Device in Reducing Surface Contamination in a New Antineoplastic Drug-Compounding Unit: A Prospective, Controlled, Parallel Study.
封闭系统转移装置在减少新型抗肿瘤药物配制单元表面污染方面的有效性:一项前瞻性、对照、平行研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0159052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159052. eCollection 2016.