• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚一家政府资助医院使用封闭系统转移装置(CSTD)进行抗肿瘤药物配制的成本分析

Cost Analysis of Using a Closed-System Transfer Device (CSTD) for Antineoplastic Drug preparation in a Malaysian Government-Funded Hospital.

作者信息

Chan Huan Keat, Lim Yik Ming

机构信息

Clinical Research Center, Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital, Alor Setar, Malaysia.Email:

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):4951-4957. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.4951.

DOI:10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.4951
PMID:28032722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5454702/
Abstract

Background: Apart from reducing occupational exposure to cytotoxic hazards, the PhaSeal® closed-system transfer device (CSTD) can extend the beyond-use dates (BUDs) of unfinished vials of antineoplastic drugs for up to 168 hours (seven days). In this study, the total material cost incurred by its use in a Malaysian government-funded hospital was calculated. Methods: A list of vial stability following initial needle punctures of 29 commonly-used antineoplastic drugs was compiled. The amount of the materials used, including drugs, infusion bottles, the PhaSeal® CSTD and other consumables, was recorded on a daily basis for three months in 2015. The total cost was calculated based on the actual acquisition costs, and was compared with that of a hypothetical scenario, whereby conventional syringe-needle sets were used for the same amounts of preparations. Results: The use of the PhaSeal® CSTD incurred a cost of MYR 383,634.52 (USD 92,072.28) in three months, representing an average of MYR 170.5 (USD 40.92) per preparation or an estimated annual cost of MYR 1,534,538.08 (USD 368,289.14). Compared with conventional syringe-needle approach, it is estimated to lead to an additional spending of MYR 148,627.68 (USD 35,670.64) yearly. Conclusion: Although there was a reduction of drug wastage achieved by extending BUDs of unfinished vials using the PhaSeal® CSTD, cost saving was not observed, likely attributable to the wide use of lower-priced generic drugs in Malaysia. Future studies should further evaluate the possibility of cost saving, especially in health settings where branded and high-cost antineoplastic drugs are more commonly used.

摘要

背景

除了减少职业暴露于细胞毒性危害外,PhaSeal® 密闭系统转移装置(CSTD)还可将未使用完的抗肿瘤药物小瓶的使用期限(BUDs)延长至168小时(七天)。在本研究中,计算了其在一家马来西亚政府资助医院使用所产生的总材料成本。方法:编制了29种常用抗肿瘤药物初次针刺后的小瓶稳定性清单。2015年,每天记录使用的材料数量,包括药物、输液瓶、PhaSeal® CSTD和其他耗材。总成本根据实际采购成本计算,并与假设情景进行比较,即使用传统注射器针头套装进行相同数量的制剂配制。结果:使用PhaSeal® CSTD在三个月内产生的成本为383,634.52马来西亚林吉特(92,072.28美元),平均每次制剂成本为170.5马来西亚林吉特(40.92美元),估计年度成本为1,534,538.08马来西亚林吉特(368,289.14美元)。与传统注射器针头方法相比,估计每年会导致额外支出148,627.68马来西亚林吉特(35,670.64美元)。结论:虽然使用PhaSeal® CSTD延长未使用完小瓶的使用期限可减少药物浪费,但未观察到成本节约,这可能归因于马来西亚广泛使用低价仿制药。未来的研究应进一步评估成本节约的可能性,特别是在更常用品牌和高成本抗肿瘤药物的医疗机构中。

相似文献

1
Cost Analysis of Using a Closed-System Transfer Device (CSTD) for Antineoplastic Drug preparation in a Malaysian Government-Funded Hospital.马来西亚一家政府资助医院使用封闭系统转移装置(CSTD)进行抗肿瘤药物配制的成本分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016 Nov 1;17(11):4951-4957. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2016.17.11.4951.
2
Cost savings realized by use of the PhaSeal(®) closed-system transfer device for preparation of antineoplastic agents.使用PhaSeal(®)封闭系统转移装置制备抗肿瘤药物所实现的成本节约。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2013 Dec;19(4):338-47. doi: 10.1177/1078155213499387. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
3
Anticancer drug waste minimization and cost-saving study by using a closed-system transfer device for chemotherapy compounding.使用封闭系统转移装置进行化疗药物配制以实现抗癌药物废物最小化和成本节约的研究。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2022 Apr;28(3):605-612. doi: 10.1177/10781552211008527. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
4
[Verification of reduction in preparation time and cost of cyclophosphamide when using the closed-system drug transfer device].[使用密闭式药物转移装置时环磷酰胺制备时间和成本降低的验证]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2014 May;41(5):611-5.
5
[Examination of Actual Medical Material Cost and Cost Reduction Related to Exposure Prevention in the Preparation of Anticancer Drugs].[抗癌药物制备中实际医疗材料成本及与暴露预防相关的成本降低情况调查]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2019 Aug;46(8):1281-1286.
6
Treatment time, ease of use and cost associated with use of Equashield™, PhaSeal , or no closed system transfer device for administration of cancer chemotherapy to a dog model.使用Equashield™、PhaSeal或不使用封闭系统转移装置向犬模型进行癌症化疗给药的治疗时间、易用性和相关成本。
Vet Comp Oncol. 2017 Mar;15(1):163-173. doi: 10.1111/vco.12148. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
7
Safe Cytotoxic Drug Preparation Using Closed-system Transfer Device: Technical and Practical Evaluation of a New Device (Vialshield/Texium) Comparatively to a Reference One (Phaseal).使用封闭系统转移装置进行细胞毒性药物的安全制备:一种新型装置(Vialshield/Texium)与参考装置(Phaseal)的技术和实际评估
Int J Pharm Compd. 2016 Mar-Apr;20(2):148-54.
8
[Effect of Increased Use of a Closed System Drug Transfer Device and Simplification of Personal Protective Equipment on the Cost of Medical Materials].[增加使用密闭式药物转移装置及简化个人防护装备对医疗材料成本的影响]
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2021 Jul;48(7):927-931.
9
A Cost Saving and Waste Minimization Study About Handling of the Antineoplastic Agents.一项关于抗肿瘤药物处理的成本节约与废物最小化研究。
Turk J Pharm Sci. 2017 Dec;14(3):304-310. doi: 10.4274/tjps.25238. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Multicenter evaluation of a new closed system drug-transfer device in reducing surface contamination by antineoplastic hazardous drugs.一种新型封闭系统药物转移装置减少抗肿瘤危险药物表面污染的多中心评估
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Feb 15;75(4):199-211. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160948. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A high-efficiency automatic pressure-relief drug transfer device for anticancer medications with superior closed performance.一种用于抗癌药物的高效自动泄压药物转移装置,具有卓越的封闭性能。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1579771. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1579771. eCollection 2025.
2
Review of studies examining microbial contamination of vials used for preparations done with closed-system drug transfer devices.研究综述:考察用于密闭式药物传输装置制备的小瓶中微生物污染情况。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2021 Mar;28(2):65-70. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001913. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Review of economic data on closed system transfer drug for preparation and administration of hazardous drugs.密闭式药物传输系统经济数据回顾:用于危险药物的准备和管理
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Nov;27(6):361-366. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001775. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Jan-Feb;73(1):27-36. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
5
Closed-system drug-transfer devices plus safe handling of hazardous drugs versus safe handling alone for reducing exposure to infusional hazardous drugs in healthcare staff.封闭系统药物转移装置加危险药物安全操作与仅进行安全操作相比,对减少医护人员接触输注性危险药物的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 27;3(3):CD012860. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012860.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Reduction in Surface Contamination With Cyclophosphamide in 30 US Hospital Pharmacies Following Implementation of a Closed-System Drug Transfer Device.在30家美国医院药房实施封闭系统药物转移装置后,环磷酰胺表面污染的减少情况
Hosp Pharm. 2013 Mar;48(3):204-12. doi: 10.1310/hpj4803-204.
2
Cost savings realized by use of the PhaSeal(®) closed-system transfer device for preparation of antineoplastic agents.使用PhaSeal(®)封闭系统转移装置制备抗肿瘤药物所实现的成本节约。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2013 Dec;19(4):338-47. doi: 10.1177/1078155213499387. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
3
Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship.医疗技术作为医疗支出增长的关键驱动因素:理清两者关系。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 May 30;5:223-34. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S39634. Print 2013.
4
Improving safety-related knowledge, attitude and practices of nurses handling cytotoxic anticancer drug: pharmacists' experience in a general hospital, Malaysia.提高处理细胞毒性抗癌药物的护士的安全相关知识、态度和实践:马来西亚一家综合医院药剂师的经验
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(1):69-73. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.1.69.
5
Economic and microbiologic evaluation of single-dose vial extension for hazardous drugs.危险药物单剂量小瓶扩展的经济和微生物学评估。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Jul;8(4):e45-9. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000488. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
6
Occupational Exposure to Antineoplastic Drugs: Identification of Job Categories Potentially Exposed throughout the Hospital Medication System.职业性接触抗肿瘤药物:确定整个医院药物系统中可能暴露的工作类别。
Saf Health Work. 2011 Sep;2(3):273-81. doi: 10.5491/SHAW.2011.2.3.273. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
7
Hygienic guidance values for wipe sampling of antineoplastic drugs in Swedish hospitals.瑞典医院抗肿瘤药物擦拭采样的卫生指导值。
J Environ Monit. 2012 Jul;14(7):1968-75. doi: 10.1039/c2em10704j. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
The PhaSeal® system: impact of its use on workplace contamination and duration of chemotherapy preparation.PhaSeal®系统:其使用对工作场所污染及化疗准备时间的影响。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2012 Mar;18(1):37-45. doi: 10.1177/1078155211401454. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
9
Reduction in surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in 22 hospital pharmacies in the US following implementation of a closed-system drug transfer device.在美国22家医院药房实施封闭系统药物转移装置后,抗肿瘤药物表面污染情况的减少。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2011 Mar;17(1):39-48. doi: 10.1177/1078155210361431. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
10
NIOSH definition of closed-system drug-transfer devices.美国国家职业安全与健康研究所对密闭式药物转移装置的定义。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Jul;53(5):549. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep030. Epub 2009 May 27.