Cervellini Marina Possato, Gamba Mônica Antar, Coca Kelly Pereira, de Vilhena Abrão Ana Cristina Freitas
Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil,
Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2014 Apr;48(2):346-56. doi: 10.1590/s0080-6234201400002000021.
This study aimed at analyzing nipple trauma resulted from breastfeeding based on dermatological approach. Two integrative reviews of literature were conducted, the first related to definitions, classification and evaluation methods of nipple trauma and another about validation studies related to this theme. In the first part were included 20 studies and only one third defined nipple trauma, more than half did not defined the nipple's injuries reported, and each author showed a particular way to assess the injuries, without consensus. In the second integrative review, no validation study or algorithm related to nipple trauma resulted from breastfeeding was found. This fact demonstrated that the nipple's injuries mentioned in the first review did not go through validation studies, justifying the lack of consensus identified as far as definition, classification and assessment methods of nipple trauma.
本研究旨在基于皮肤病学方法分析母乳喂养导致的乳头创伤。进行了两项文献综合综述,第一项涉及乳头创伤的定义、分类和评估方法,另一项关于与此主题相关的验证研究。在第一部分纳入了20项研究,只有三分之一定义了乳头创伤,超过一半未对所报告的乳头损伤进行定义,且每位作者都展示了一种特定的损伤评估方法,未达成共识。在第二项综合综述中,未发现与母乳喂养导致的乳头创伤相关的验证研究或算法。这一事实表明,第一次综述中提到的乳头损伤未经过验证研究,这就解释了在乳头创伤的定义、分类和评估方法方面缺乏共识的原因。