Suppr超能文献

制定关于改善农村社区健康食品获取政策的研究议程:一项概念图研究

Developing an agenda for research about policies to improve access to healthy foods in rural communities: a concept mapping study.

作者信息

Johnson Donna B, Quinn Emilee, Sitaker Marilyn, Ammerman Alice, Byker Carmen, Dean Wesley, Fleischhacker Sheila, Kolodinsky Jane, Pinard Courtney, Pitts Stephanie B Jilcott, Sharkey Joseph

机构信息

Nutritional Sciences, University of Washington, 98195, Box 353410, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2014 Jun 12;14:592. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-592.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Policies that improve access to healthy, affordable foods may improve population health and reduce health disparities. In the United States most food access policy research focuses on urban communities even though residents of rural communities face disproportionately higher risk for nutrition-related chronic diseases compared to residents of urban communities. The purpose of this study was to (1) identify the factors associated with access to healthy, affordable food in rural communities in the United States; and (2) prioritize a meaningful and feasible rural food policy research agenda.

METHODS

This study was conducted by the Rural Food Access Workgroup (RFAWG), a workgroup facilitated by the Nutrition and Obesity Policy Research and Evaluation Network. A national sample of academic and non-academic researchers, public health and cooperative extension practitioners, and other experts who focus on rural food access and economic development was invited to complete a concept mapping process that included brainstorming the factors that are associated with rural food access, sorting and organizing the factors into similar domains, and rating the importance of policies and research to address these factors. As a last step, RFAWG members convened to interpret the data and establish research recommendations.

RESULTS

Seventy-five participants in the brainstorming exercise represented the following sectors: non-extension research (n = 27), non-extension program administration (n = 18), "other" (n = 14), policy advocacy (n = 10), and cooperative extension service (n = 6). The brainstorming exercise generated 90 distinct statements about factors associated with rural food access in the United States; these were sorted into 5 clusters. Go Zones were established for the factors that were rated highly as both a priority policy target and a priority for research. The highest ranked policy and research priorities include strategies designed to build economic viability in rural communities, improve access to federal food and nutrition assistance programs, improve food retail systems, and increase the personal food production capacity of rural residents. Respondents also prioritized the development of valid and reliable research methodologies to measure variables associated with rural food access.

CONCLUSIONS

This collaborative, trans-disciplinary, participatory process, created a map to guide and prioritize research about polices to improve healthy, affordable food access in rural communities.

摘要

背景

改善健康、平价食品可及性的政策或许能提升民众健康水平并减少健康差异。在美国,尽管农村社区居民相较于城市社区居民面临更高的营养相关慢性病风险,但大多数食品可及性政策研究都聚焦于城市社区。本研究的目的是:(1)确定与美国农村社区健康、平价食品可及性相关的因素;(2)确定一个有意义且可行的农村食品政策研究议程的优先级。

方法

本研究由农村食品可及性工作组(RFAWG)开展,该工作组由营养与肥胖政策研究与评估网络推动。邀请了来自学术和非学术研究、公共卫生与合作推广实践以及专注于农村食品可及性与经济发展的其他专家的全国性样本,来完成一个概念映射过程,其中包括就与农村食品可及性相关的因素进行头脑风暴、将这些因素分类整理到相似领域,以及对解决这些因素的政策和研究的重要性进行评级。作为最后一步,RFAWG成员聚集起来解读数据并确定研究建议。

结果

头脑风暴练习中的75名参与者代表了以下部门:非推广研究(n = 27)、非推广项目管理(n = 18)、“其他”(n = 14)、政策倡导(n = 10)以及合作推广服务(n = 6)。头脑风暴练习产生了90条关于美国农村食品可及性相关因素的不同陈述;这些陈述被归类为5个集群。针对那些被高度评为优先政策目标和研究重点的因素设立了“行动区域”。排名最高的政策和研究重点包括旨在增强农村社区经济活力、改善联邦食品与营养援助项目可及性、改善食品零售系统以及提高农村居民个人食品生产能力的策略。受访者还将开发有效且可靠的研究方法以测量与农村食品可及性相关的变量列为优先事项。

结论

这一协作性、跨学科、参与性的过程创建了一张地图,以指导并确定关于改善农村社区健康、平价食品可及性政策的研究优先级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验