Suppr超能文献

充满激情的学术研究还是学术安全:一个伦理问题。

Passionate scholarship or academic safety: an ethical issue.

作者信息

Merryfeather Lyn

机构信息

University of Victoria

出版信息

J Holist Nurs. 2015 Mar;33(1):60-7. doi: 10.1177/0898010114538320. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

Abstract

Are we passionate scholars or is academic safety something to which we aspire? Do we teach our students one thing and practice another? Are some forms of scholarship more acclaimed than others, some methodologies more acceptable? What are the ethical implications in these various questions? In this article, I outline my experiences, both as a student researcher and as an educator, that have brought me to ask these things. Holism is an ideal that many nursing students are taught and encouraged to bring to their practice, and yet holism does not seem, in many instances, to be supported in academia or in bedside practice. I suggest the possible causes for these difficulties and propose solutions. I suggest that the bedrock of ethical practice, both in the academy and with patients, is to bring all of who we are, the alchemic mystery of holism, to everything we do.

摘要

我们是充满激情的学者,还是追求学术安全?我们是否对学生言传身教不一?某些学术形式是否比其他形式更受赞誉,某些方法是否更易被接受?这些问题背后的伦理含义是什么?在本文中,我概述了自己作为学生研究者和教育工作者的经历,正是这些经历促使我思考这些问题。整体论是许多护理专业学生在学习过程中被教导并鼓励应用于实践的理念,但在很多情况下,整体论在学术界或临床实践中似乎并未得到支持。我提出了造成这些困境的可能原因并给出了解决方案。我认为,无论是在学术界还是面对患者,道德实践的基石都是将我们的全部——整体论的神奇奥秘——融入我们所做的每一件事。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验