Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Chatham, United Kingdom; Southern African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Southern African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014 Jun 12;8(6):e2901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002901. eCollection 2014 Jun.
Male and female tsetse flies feed exclusively on vertebrate blood. While doing so they can transmit the diseases of sleeping sickness in humans and nagana in domestic stock. Knowledge of the host-orientated behavior of tsetse is important in designing bait methods of sampling and controlling the flies, and in understanding the epidemiology of the diseases. For this we must explain several puzzling distinctions in the behavior of the different sexes and species of tsetse. For example, why is it that the species occupying savannahs, unlike those of riverine habitats, appear strongly responsive to odor, rely mainly on large hosts, are repelled by humans, and are often shy of alighting on baits?
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A deterministic model that simulated fly mobility and host-finding success suggested that the behavioral distinctions between riverine, savannah and forest tsetse are due largely to habitat size and shape, and the extent to which dense bushes limit occupiable space within the habitats. These factors seemed effective primarily because they affect the daily displacement of tsetse, reducing it by up to ∼70%. Sex differences in behavior are explicable by females being larger and more mobile than males.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: Habitat geometry and fly size provide a framework that can unify much of the behavior of all sexes and species of tsetse everywhere. The general expectation is that relatively immobile insects in restricted habitats tend to be less responsive to host odors and more catholic in their diet. This has profound implications for the optimization of bait technology for tsetse, mosquitoes, black flies and tabanids, and for the epidemiology of the diseases they transmit.
雄性和雌性采采蝇仅以脊椎动物血液为食。在进食过程中,它们可能会传播人类昏睡病和家畜纳格纳病。了解采采蝇以宿主为导向的行为对于设计诱饵采样和控制苍蝇的方法以及理解疾病的流行病学非常重要。为此,我们必须解释不同性别和物种采采蝇行为中的几个令人费解的区别。例如,为什么栖息在草原上的物种与河流栖息地的物种不同,它们对气味的反应非常强烈,主要以大型宿主为食,对人类有排斥作用,而且经常对诱饵不屑一顾?
方法/主要发现:一个模拟苍蝇移动性和宿主寻找成功率的确定性模型表明,河流、草原和森林采采蝇之间的行为差异主要归因于栖息地的大小和形状,以及茂密的灌木丛在多大程度上限制了栖息地内可占用的空间。这些因素似乎主要是因为它们影响了采采蝇的日常位移,使其减少了约 70%。雌性比雄性更大、更灵活,这可以解释行为上的性别差异。
结论/意义:栖息地几何形状和苍蝇大小为所有性别和物种的采采蝇的行为提供了一个框架,可以将其统一起来。一般来说,在受限栖息地中相对不活跃的昆虫对宿主气味的反应性较低,饮食也更加多样化。这对优化采采蝇、蚊子、黑蝇和虻的诱饵技术以及它们传播的疾病的流行病学具有深远的意义。