Suppr超能文献

欧姆龙X-HJ-304-E和百利达SW-700/701计步器在不同速度和各种坡度下的准确性如何?

How accurate are Omron X-HJ-304-E and Yamax SW-700/701 pedometers at different speeds and various inclinations?

作者信息

Wallmann-Sperlich B, Froboese I, Reed J L, Mathes S, Sperlich B

机构信息

Institute of Sport Science Julius‑Maximilians‑University, Würzburg, Germany -

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 Jan-Feb;55(1-2):113-7. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate step count and energy expenditure accuracy of the piezoelectric Omron (Walking Style X-HJ-304-E) and spring-levered Yamax (Digi-Walker-SW-700/701) pedometers at different speeds and various inclinations.

METHODS

Thirty subjects (15 females, aged: 24 ± 3 years) completed eleven 5-min trials at different treadmill speeds and inclinations (3.24 km∙h⁻¹ [inclination: 0, 9, 20%], 4.68 km∙h⁻¹ [0, 9, 20%], 6.48 km∙h⁻¹ [0, 9%], 9 km∙h⁻¹ [0%], 10.8 km∙h⁻¹ [0%], 12.6 km∙h⁻¹ [0%]). During each trial, an investigator recorded actual steps with a hand tally counter. Actual energy expenditure was measured using a portable indirect calorimeter.

RESULTS

The Omron pedometer revealed high step count accuracy for all speeds and inclinations when worn on the hip or a backpack (Mean % of actual steps: 99.6%; Range: 95.8-101.3%). The Yamax pedometer revealed high step count accuracy (Mean % of actual steps: 99.8%; Range: 96.2-103.3%) when worn on the left hip at 6.48-12.6 km∙h⁻¹ (0%), 4.68 km∙h⁻¹ (9%, 20%), 6.48 km∙h⁻¹ (9%) and on the right hip at 10.8 km∙h⁻¹ (0%) and 6.48 km∙h⁻¹ (9%). The accuracy of the Omron and Yamax determined energy expenditure was poor (57.9-59.7%) when compared to indirect calorimetry.

CONCLUSION

The Omron pedometer provides accurate step counts when worn on the hip and backpack at all tested speeds and inclinations. We therefore suggest an accurate application of this device for walking, hiking and running at moderate speeds. Both pedometers underestimated energy expenditure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查压电式欧姆龙计步器(步行风格X-HJ-304-E型)和弹簧杠杆式百利达计步器(电子计步器SW-700/701型)在不同速度和各种坡度下的步数计数及能量消耗准确性。

方法

30名受试者(15名女性,年龄:24±3岁)在不同的跑步机速度和坡度(3.24千米·小时⁻¹[坡度:0、9、20%],4.68千米·小时⁻¹[0、9、20%],6.48千米·小时⁻¹[0、9%],9千米·小时⁻¹[0%],10.8千米·小时⁻¹[0%],12.6千米·小时⁻¹[0%])下完成了11次5分钟的试验。在每次试验期间,一名研究人员用手持式计数器记录实际步数。使用便携式间接热量计测量实际能量消耗。

结果

当欧姆龙计步器佩戴在臀部或背包上时,在所有速度和坡度下均显示出较高的步数计数准确性(实际步数的平均百分比:99.6%;范围:95.8 - 101.3%)。当百利达计步器在6.48 - 12.6千米·小时⁻¹(0%)、4.68千米·小时⁻¹(9%、20%)、6.48千米·小时⁻¹(9%)时佩戴在左臀部,以及在10.8千米·小时⁻¹(0%)和6.48千米·小时⁻¹(9%)时佩戴在右臀部时,显示出较高的步数计数准确性(实际步数的平均百分比:99.8%;范围:96.2 - 103.3%)。与间接热量测定法相比,欧姆龙和百利达计步器测定的能量消耗准确性较差(57.9 - 59.7%)。

结论

欧姆龙计步器在所有测试的速度和坡度下,佩戴在臀部和背包上时能提供准确的步数计数。因此,我们建议在中等速度的步行、徒步旅行和跑步中准确应用该设备。两种计步器均低估了能量消耗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验