Suppr超能文献

测量步数:为何不能假设测量数据可靠。

Measuring step count: why it is important not to assume measures are reliable.

机构信息

Physiotherapy Research Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, UK.

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2021 Mar;110:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The validity and reliability of pedometer software Apps versus the previously investigated spring lever and piezoelectric pedometers is unknown.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the validity and reliability (in adults aged 18-65) of two pedometer software Apps, the Walk Star and the Accupedo, with spring lever (Digi-Walker CW 700) and piezoelectric (Omron HJ-720ITC and Tanita PD-724) pedometers in the measurement of step count. The criterion for comparison was researcher tallied direct observation of step count using an electronic E3-EHT hand held tally counter.

METHODS

Eighteen participants walked for 5minutes on a treadmill at slow (2miles per hour) moderate (3miles per hour) and fast walking (4miles per hour) speeds and on urban streets and upon grass at a perceived "comfortable" walking speed.

RESULTS

Bland and Altman plots show wide limits of agreement observed for the Yamax CW 700, Accupedo App and Walk Star App, suggesting these pedometers are unsuitable for measuring step counts in individuals due to high random error (indicating low reliability). Narrow limits of agreement were observed for the Omron HJ-720ITC and the Tanita PD-724 pedometers compared against Tally count and were considered suitable for use.

CONCLUSION

The validity and reliability of pedometers cannot be assumed but must be tested and ensured before use in measuring step count.

摘要

背景

计步器软件应用程序与之前研究的弹簧杆和压电计的有效性和可靠性尚不清楚。

目的

评估两种计步器软件应用程序(Walk Star 和 Accupedo)的有效性和可靠性(在 18-65 岁成年人中),并将其与弹簧杆(Digi-Walker CW 700)和压电计(Omron HJ-720ITC 和 Tanita PD-724)计步器在计步方面进行比较。比较的标准是研究人员使用电子 E3-EHT 手持计数器对计步进行直接计数。

方法

18 名参与者在跑步机上以慢(2 英里/小时)、中(3 英里/小时)和快(4 英里/小时)速度以及城市街道和草地以“舒适”步行速度行走 5 分钟。

结果

Bland 和 Altman 图显示,Yamax CW 700、Accupedo App 和 Walk Star App 的观察一致性范围较宽,表明这些计步器不适合测量个体的步数,因为随机误差较高(表明可靠性低)。与 Tally 计数相比,Omron HJ-720ITC 和 Tanita PD-724 计步器的一致性范围较窄,被认为适合使用。

结论

在测量步数时,不能假设计步器的有效性和可靠性,必须进行测试并确保。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验