Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jan;112(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1951-y. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of walking speed on the accuracy of measurement of steps, distance, and energy expenditure of two commercially available Omron pedometers [HJ-720IT-E2 (HJ-720) and HJ-113-E (HJ-113)]. Twenty-four untrained males (age, 22.7 ± 2.8 years; BMI, 24.38 ± 2.19 kg m(-2); body fat (%), 16 ± 2.2; VO(2max), 40.2 ± 6.5 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) and 18 females (age, 22.4 ± 2.9 years; BMI, 21.68 ± 2.43 kg m(-2); body fat (%), 23% ± 1.8; VO(2max), 35.9 ± 2.8 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) walked at five different velocities (54, 67, 80, 94 and 107 m min(-1)) on a treadmill in 5-min stages while wearing three types of pedometers: (a) HJ-720, (b) HJ-113, and (c) Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 (YAM). Step-count for each pedometer was recorded at the end of each stage and compared with the value of a hand counter. Additionally, Omron pedometers were evaluated on their distance and energy expenditure (against VO(2) measurement with a gas-exchange analyzer) accuracy during each stage. HJ-720 and HJ-113 demonstrated high accuracy (r = 0.80-0.99) at all speeds. YAM underestimated step-count only at 54 m min(-1) (r = 0.46). HJ-720 and HJ-113 overestimated distance at slower speeds and underestimated distance at faster speeds, providing mean distance values that where to within 1.5-4% at 80 m min(-1). HJ-720 and HJ-113 underestimated energy expenditure (gross kilocalories) by 28%, when compared to indirect calorimetry. These results suggest that although the Omron HJ-720 and HJ-113 pedometers are accurate in the measurement of step-count, they demonstrate limited accuracy in the assessment of traveled distance and energy expenditure in a speed-dependent manner.
本研究旨在考察两种市售欧姆龙计步器(HJ-720IT-E2 [HJ-720] 和 HJ-113-E [HJ-113])在行走速度对步数、距离和能量消耗测量精度的影响。24 名未经训练的男性(年龄 22.7 ± 2.8 岁;BMI 24.38 ± 2.19 kg m(-2);体脂(%)16 ± 2.2;VO(2max) 40.2 ± 6.5 ml kg(-1) min(-1))和 18 名女性(年龄 22.4 ± 2.9 岁;BMI 21.68 ± 2.43 kg m(-2);体脂(%)23% ± 1.8;VO(2max) 35.9 ± 2.8 ml kg(-1) min(-1))在跑步机上以 5 分钟为一个阶段,以 5 种不同速度(54、67、80、94 和 107 m min(-1))行走,期间佩戴三种计步器:(a)HJ-720,(b)HJ-113,和(c)Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200(YAM)。每个阶段结束时记录每个计步器的步数,并与手动计数器的值进行比较。此外,在每个阶段还评估了欧姆龙计步器在距离和能量消耗(与气体交换分析仪测量的 VO(2)进行比较)方面的准确性。HJ-720 和 HJ-113 在所有速度下均表现出高度的准确性(r = 0.80-0.99)。YAM 仅在 54 m min(-1)时低估了步数(r = 0.46)。HJ-720 和 HJ-113 在较慢的速度下高估了距离,在较快的速度下低估了距离,在 80 m min(-1)时提供的距离值误差在 1.5-4%以内。与间接测热法相比,HJ-720 和 HJ-113 低估了能量消耗(总千卡)28%。这些结果表明,尽管欧姆龙 HJ-720 和 HJ-113 计步器在步数测量方面准确,但它们在以速度依赖的方式评估行进距离和能量消耗方面的准确性有限。