Hussainy Safeera Y, Stewart Kay, Pham My-Phuong
Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(3):310-6. doi: 10.1071/PY14006.
The aim of this study was to determine supply practices of Victorian community pharmacies in relation to the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP), following release of an updated guideline by the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia. Telephone call scripts were developed for three scenarios in which the ECP was requested: outside the licensed 72-h time frame (Scenario 1); by a woman under 16 years (Scenario 2); and for future use (Scenario 3). From 1222 pharmacies, 515 were randomly selected and allocated into three groups: 177 to Scenario 1 and 169 to each of Scenarios 2 and 3. Pharmacists' responses were categorised as 'yes', 'no' or 'ambiguous' and descriptive statistics were calculated. The results are as follows. Scenario 1: over half (55.4%; 92/166) declined supply and most referred to the doctor, citing the time frame or the ECP as no longer being effective reasons. Decreased effectiveness was readily discussed among those willing to supply. Scenario 2: more than half (53.9%, 89/165) agreed to supply, assessing the request against eligibility criteria outlined in the guideline; however, 5.6% (5/89) were only willing if the woman obtained a doctor's prescription or recommendation. Scenario 3: less than half (40.5%; 66/163) declined supply, mainly due to no therapeutic need. Only four respondents willing to give the ECP knew that supply was bona fide. In conclusion, pharmacists' practices are variable and not always in line with the recommendations of the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia guideline. Pharmacists' awareness of the guideline needs to be raised so women can unobtrusively access the ECP.
本研究的目的是,在澳大利亚药学会发布更新指南后,确定维多利亚州社区药房在紧急避孕药(ECP)供应方面的做法。针对三种请求提供紧急避孕药的场景编写了电话脚本:超出许可的72小时时限(场景1);由16岁以下女性请求(场景2);以及用于未来使用(场景3)。从1222家药房中随机选取515家,并分为三组:177家分配到场景1,169家分别分配到场景2和场景3。药剂师的回答分为“是”、“否”或“不明确”,并计算描述性统计数据。结果如下。场景1:超过一半(55.4%;92/166)拒绝供应,大多数建议咨询医生,理由是超出时限或紧急避孕药不再有效。在愿意供应的人中,很容易讨论到有效性降低的问题。场景2:超过一半(53.9%,89/165)同意供应,根据指南中概述的资格标准评估请求;然而,5.6%(5/89)仅在女性获得医生处方或建议时才愿意供应。场景3:不到一半(40.5%;66/163)拒绝供应,主要原因是没有治疗需求。只有四名愿意提供紧急避孕药的受访者知道供应是善意的。总之,药剂师的做法各不相同,并不总是符合澳大利亚药学会指南的建议。需要提高药剂师对该指南的认识,以便女性能够顺利获取紧急避孕药。