Banerjee Marc, Müller-Hübenthal Jonas, Grimme Stefan, Balke Maurice, Bouillon Bertil, Lefering Rolf, Goßmann Axel, Shafizadeh Sven
Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Health - School of Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Witten/Herdecke University, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Praxis im KölnTriangle, Cologne, Germany.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun;24(6):1888-95. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3102-6. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
The purpose of the present study was to determine the value of shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained in the community setting interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists in patients with shoulder pain initiated by a single non-dislocating shoulder trauma.
In 56 of 61 consecutive patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy due to pain after a single non-dislocating shoulder trauma, the data sets of non-contrast MRI were complete. These were retrospectively interpreted by three radiologists specialized on musculoskeletal MRI who were blinded for patients' history and who did not have access to the reports of arthroscopy. Standard evaluation forms were used to assess the MRIs for superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions, anterior or posterior labrum lesions, lesions of the long head of biceps tendon (LHB) and for partial tears of the supraspinatus tendon and the upper quarter of the subscapularis tendon. Quality of the MRI was assessed by each radiologist on a four-point scale.
The pooled sensitivity for the three radiologists for the detection of SLAP lesions was 45.0 %, for anterior or posterior labrum tears 77.8 and 66.7 %, for lesions of the LHB 63.2 % and for partial tears of the supraspinatus or subscapularis tendon tears 84.8 and 33.3 %. Corresponding inter-rater reliabilities were poor (SLAP lesions) to substantial (anterior labrum tears). Quality of MRI only influenced the accuracy for the detection of posterior labrum tears.
A non-contrast shoulder MRI obtained in the community setting after non-dislocating shoulder trauma has a moderate sensitivity for most intraarticular pathologies when interpreted by musculoskeletal radiologists. Accuracy is dependent on the observer and not on the assessed quality.
Case series, Level IV.
本研究旨在确定在社区环境中由肌肉骨骼放射科医生解读的肩部磁共振成像(MRI)对因单次非脱位性肩部创伤引发肩部疼痛的患者的价值。
在61例因单次非脱位性肩部创伤后疼痛而接受肩关节镜检查的连续患者中,56例患者的非增强MRI数据集完整。由三位专门从事肌肉骨骼MRI的放射科医生对这些数据集进行回顾性解读,他们对患者病史不知情且无法获取关节镜检查报告。使用标准评估表评估MRI,以确定上盂唇前后(SLAP)损伤、前或后盂唇损伤、肱二头肌长头(LHB)损伤以及冈上肌腱和肩胛下肌腱上四分之一的部分撕裂情况。每位放射科医生使用四分制对MRI质量进行评估。
三位放射科医生检测SLAP损伤的合并敏感度为45.0%,检测前或后盂唇撕裂的敏感度分别为77.8%和66.7%,检测LHB损伤的敏感度为63.2%,检测冈上肌或肩胛下肌腱部分撕裂的敏感度分别为84.8%和33.3%。相应的评分者间信度从差(SLAP损伤)到实质性(前盂唇撕裂)不等。MRI质量仅影响后盂唇撕裂检测的准确性。
在社区环境中,非脱位性肩部创伤后获得的非增强肩部MRI在由肌肉骨骼放射科医生解读时,对大多数关节内病变具有中等敏感度。准确性取决于观察者而非评估的质量。
病例系列,IV级。