Orthopedics, University Medicine Rostock, Germany.
Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, ATOS Klinik Fleetinsel Hamburg, Germany.
Rofo. 2021 Jul;193(7):797-803. doi: 10.1055/a-1328-3142. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common reasons for shoulder pain, and patients often present initially to general practitioners. However, subscapularis tears are especially difficult to diagnose and hence adequate therapy is often delayed. General practitioners or non-specialist orthopedic surgeons need reliable MRI findings to allow timely referral of patients to shoulder specialists. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the written MRI report of patients with arthroscopically proven subscapularis tendon tears.
In this retrospective study, 97 patients (mean age 62.4 ± 10 years, 63 men) who underwent arthroscopic subscapularis repair between April 2013 and January 2015 by two experienced shoulder surgeons and who underwent a preoperative 1.5 T MRI study were included. All of these patients had high-field strength (i. e., ≥ 1.5 T) standard MRI scans performed within 4-164 (mean 57.4 ± 38.4) days before their arthroscopic procedures.
Subscapularis tendon tears, verified by arthroscopy, were correctly identified in only 37 of 97 cases in the written report of the preoperative MRI. This resulted in an overall low sensitivity of 38.1 %. Correctly predicted lesions were as follows: Fox and Romeo I 29.4 % (5/17 patients), Fox and Romeo II 20 % (7/35 patients), Fox and Romeo III 46.7 % (14/30 patients) and Fox and Romeo IV 73.3 % (11/15 patients). In contrast, concurrent supraspinatus tendon tears were identified correctly in 88.2 % of patients (60/68 cases, sensitivity 88.2 %, specificity 96.5 %). Preoperative written radiology reports provided by a heterogeneous group of 39 presumably non-MSK-specialized radiologic centers do not reliably detect subscapularis tendon tears and are not sufficient for guiding patients to specialist centers. Compared to other rotator cuff injuries, this study shows difficulties in the correct diagnosis of subscapular tendon injuries. However, this is necessary to provide patients with timely therapy. It can be assumed that MRI review by musculoskeletal-specialized radiologists would more often than not lead to the correct diagnosis.
· Subscapularis tendon ruptures are difficult to diagnose on standard shoulder MRI.. · Written MRI reports from non-musculoskeletal-specialized radiologists are not reliable, especially for smaller lesions.. · Reliable findings are required for referral allocation to shoulder specialists (specialized musculoskeletal radiologists)..
· Lenz R, Kircher J, Schwalba K et al. Subscapularis Tendon Tears - Usefulness of Written MRI Reports for Guiding Patient Referral to Shoulder Specialists. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 797 - 803.
肩袖撕裂是肩部疼痛最常见的原因之一,患者通常首先向全科医生就诊。然而,肩胛下肌撕裂尤其难以诊断,因此往往会延迟适当的治疗。全科医生或非专业骨科医生需要可靠的 MRI 结果,以便及时将患者转介给肩部专家。本研究旨在确定关节镜下证实的肩胛下肌腱撕裂患者的书面 MRI 报告的有效性。
在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了 97 名患者(平均年龄 62.4±10 岁,63 名男性),这些患者在 2013 年 4 月至 2015 年 1 月期间由两位经验丰富的肩部外科医生进行了关节镜下肩胛下肌修复,并在关节镜手术前 4-164 天内(平均 57.4±38.4 天)进行了术前 1.5T MRI 研究。所有这些患者都进行了高场强(即≥1.5T)标准 MRI 扫描。
在术前 MRI 书面报告中,仅正确识别出 97 例肩胛下肌腱撕裂中的 37 例。这导致总体敏感性仅为 38.1%。正确预测的病变如下:Fox 和 Romeo I 为 29.4%(17 例患者中的 5 例),Fox 和 Romeo II 为 20%(35 例患者中的 7 例),Fox 和 Romeo III 为 46.7%(30 例患者中的 14 例),Fox 和 Romeo IV 为 73.3%(15 例患者中的 11 例)。相比之下,在 88.2%的患者(60/68 例,敏感性 88.2%,特异性 96.5%)中正确识别出同时发生的冈上肌腱撕裂。来自 39 个可能非肌肉骨骼专业放射中心的异质组的术前书面放射学报告不能可靠地检测肩胛下肌腱撕裂,并且不足以指导患者到专家中心就诊。与其他肩袖损伤相比,本研究显示肩胛下肌腱损伤的正确诊断存在困难。然而,这是为患者提供及时治疗所必需的。可以假设,由肌肉骨骼专业放射科医生进行的 MRI 复查通常会导致正确的诊断。
·肩胛下肌腱撕裂在标准肩部 MRI 上难以诊断。·非肌肉骨骼专业放射科医生的书面 MRI 报告不可靠,尤其是对于较小的病变。·需要可靠的发现来指导患者转诊至肩部专家(专业的肌肉骨骼放射科医生)。
·Lenz R, Kircher J, Schwalba K 等.肩胛下肌腱撕裂 - 指导患者转诊至肩部专家的书面 MRI 报告的实用性。Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 797-803.