Suppr超能文献

两种家鸡品系中恐惧的评估:不同方法之间的相关性。

Estimation of fear in two lines of the domestic chick: Correlations between various methods.

作者信息

Bryan Jones R, Mills A D

机构信息

Agricultural Research Council's Poultry Research Centre, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9PS, Great Britain.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 1983 Jul;8(3):243-53. doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(83)90015-3.

Abstract

The assessment of fear is a controversial issue and low levels of correlation between different measures have been used to criticise the fear concept. The present study assessed fear levels in individual domestic chicks of each of two lines, flighty and docile, using four commonly employed methods of estimating fear. They were the hole-in-the-wall box, the open field, response to a bell and tonic immobility. On the basis of a wide variety of behavioural responses each chick was ranked for fearfulness in each of the four tests. The degrees of association or correlation between these ranking within lines were then calculated. The significant intra-individual correlations found in both lines provides some support for the use of these tests as methods of estimating fear, at least within the lines used. Differences in the degree or form of fear-responding between the lines are also discussed in terms of reactions to handling and to sudden auditory stimuli.

摘要

恐惧评估是一个有争议的问题,不同测量方法之间的低相关性被用来批评恐惧概念。本研究使用四种常用的恐惧评估方法,对两个品系(易惊和温顺)的个体家鸡的恐惧水平进行了评估。这四种方法分别是:穿墙箱试验、旷场试验、对铃声的反应以及强直性静止试验。基于各种各样的行为反应,对每只小鸡在四项测试中的恐惧程度进行了排名。然后计算了各品系内这些排名之间的关联度或相关性。在两个品系中都发现了显著的个体内相关性,这为将这些测试用作恐惧评估方法提供了一些支持,至少在所使用的品系范围内是这样。还根据对处理和突然听觉刺激的反应,讨论了两个品系之间恐惧反应程度或形式的差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验