Salgado Pardo J I, Navas González Francisco Javier, González Ariza Antonio, Arando Arbulu A, León Jurado J M, Delgado Bermejo J V, Camacho Vallejo M E
Department of Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Department of Agriculture and Ecological Husbandry, Area of Agriculture and Environment, Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), Córdoba, Spain.
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Aug 15;9:948502. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.948502. eCollection 2022.
Early sex determination methods are not only crucial in the worldwide massive poultry industry, but also for small-holder producers. The profitability of sexing techniques must be accounted for when aiming to boost management, nutrition, and conservation practices in endangered poultry breeds. This becomes pivotal when the local breed dealt with belongs to an understudied species, such as the turkey. So, the main objective of this study is to identify which method combination may report a higher likelihood of successful sex determination in poults across the three-pattern varieties of the Andalusian turkey breed. A total of 84 one to two days old Andalusian turkey poults (42 black, 28 black-roan, and 14 bronze-roan) were evaluated in this study. Sex determination was performed using 15 methods, which included testing external egg metrics and eggshell color, poult morphological appraisal and phaneroptics, and behavioral traits. Possible differences across plumage varieties and the interaction between sex and plumage were observed when external egg quality was measured. Sex determination through behavioral methods in black base feathered (black and black-roan) male sex individuals showed seven times higher sensitivity when compared to the rest of the studied individuals (χ = 7.14, df = 1, < 0.01). In contrast, for the black-roan plumage females, the method based on the color of down feathers was approximately four times more sensitive (χ = 3.95, df = 1, ≤ 0.05). For the bronze-roan pattern, none of the sexing techniques was reported to efficiently predict sex itself. However, the most proper method combination to determine sex, independent of plumage color, was physical external egg characteristics, the color of down feathers, and behavioral approaches ("English method" and "slap technique"). The specificity values were found to be 49.12, 93.33, and 100%, while the sensitivity values were observed to be 74.64, 91.03, and 100%, which translated into accuracy of 63.10, 92.26, and 100% in black, black-roan, and bronze-roan poults, respectively. Our results suggest that the method combination tested in this study could be considered a highly accurate, simple, and affordable alternative for sex determination in turkeys. This could mean a pivotal advance for small producers of turkeys, as early sex detection can help to plan timely conservational management strategies, which is of prominent importance in the context of endangered poultry breeds.
早期性别鉴定方法不仅在全球大规模家禽业中至关重要,对小规模养殖户也同样重要。在旨在加强濒危家禽品种的管理、营养和保护措施时,必须考虑性别鉴定技术的盈利能力。当所涉及的本地品种属于研究较少的物种,如火鸡时,这一点就变得至关重要。因此,本研究的主要目的是确定哪种方法组合在安达卢西亚火鸡品种的三种羽色类型的雏鸡中,可能具有更高的成功性别鉴定可能性。本研究共评估了84只1至2日龄的安达卢西亚火鸡雏鸡(42只黑色、28只黑褐相间色和14只青铜褐相间色)。使用15种方法进行性别鉴定,包括检测外部蛋指标和蛋壳颜色、雏鸡形态评估和显光学以及行为特征。在测量外部蛋质量时,观察到羽色品种之间可能存在差异以及性别与羽色之间的相互作用。通过行为方法对黑色羽基(黑色和黑褐相间色)雄性个体进行性别鉴定时,其灵敏度比其他研究个体高出7倍(χ = 7.14,自由度 = 1,P < 0.01)。相比之下,对于黑褐相间色羽的雌性个体,基于绒毛颜色的方法灵敏度高出约4倍(χ = 3.95,自由度 = 1,P ≤ 0.05)。对于青铜褐相间色类型,没有一种性别鉴定技术能有效地预测性别本身。然而,不考虑羽色确定性别的最适宜方法组合是外部蛋的物理特征、绒毛颜色和行为方法(“英式方法”和“拍打技术”)。特异性值分别为49.12%、93.33%和100%,而灵敏度值分别为74.64%、91.03%和100%,这分别转化为黑色、黑褐相间色和青铜褐相间色雏鸡的准确率为63.10%、92.26%和100%。我们的结果表明,本研究中测试的方法组合可被视为一种用于火鸡性别鉴定的高度准确、简单且经济实惠的替代方法。这可能对小火鸡养殖户来说是一个关键进展,因为早期性别检测有助于及时制定保护管理策略,这在濒危家禽品种的背景下尤为重要。