Buc E, Couvelard A, Kwiatkowski F, Dokmak S, Ruszniewski P, Hammel P, Belghiti J, Sauvanet A
Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery - Pôle des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif (PMAD), AP-HP, hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Department of Pathology, AP-HP, hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;40(11):1578-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.04.012. Epub 2014 May 21.
Lymph node (LN) invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most important prognostic factor after surgical resection. The mechanisms of LN invasion include lymphatic spreading and/or direct extension from the main tumor. However, few studies have assessed the impact of these different patterns of invasion on prognosis.
Pathologic reports of pancreatic resections for PDAC from 1997 to 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. The mode of LN invasion was defined as follows: standard lymphatic metastases (S), contiguous from the main tumor (C) and standard with extracapsular invasion (EI). Clinical outcomes were compared according to the mode of invasion and the number of invaded LN.
306 patients were reviewed. Median age at resection was 61 years (range, 34-81). Eighty seven patients were N- (28.9%) and 214 were N+ (71.1%). Of the N+ patients, 195 (91.1%) were S+, 35 (16.3%) were C+, and 24 (12.3% of the S+ patients) were EI+. Median survival in N+ patients was lower than in N- patients (29 vs. 57 months, p < 0.001). In patients without standard involvement, C+ patients (n = 19) had worse survival than C- patients (n = 47) (34 vs. 57 months, p = 0.037). In S+ patients, C status was correlated with prognosis when the number of LN S+ was <2 (p = 0.07). EI status had no influence on prognosis. On multivariate analysis, only perineural invasion (p = 0.02) and LN ratio (p = 0.042) were independent prognostic factors.
Direct invasion of LN by the tumor is predictive of reduced survival, but has little impact compared to standard LN involvement and perineural invasion.
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中的淋巴结(LN)侵犯是手术切除后最重要的预后因素。LN侵犯的机制包括淋巴转移和/或源自主要肿瘤的直接蔓延。然而,很少有研究评估这些不同侵犯模式对预后的影响。
回顾性分析1997年至2007年因PDAC行胰腺切除术的病理报告。LN侵犯模式定义如下:标准淋巴转移(S)、与主要肿瘤连续(C)以及伴有包膜外侵犯的标准模式(EI)。根据侵犯模式和受累LN数量比较临床结局。
共纳入306例患者。切除时的中位年龄为61岁(范围34 - 81岁)。87例患者为N-(28.9%),214例为N+(71.1%)。在N+患者中,195例(91.1%)为S+,35例(16.3%)为C+,24例(占S+患者的12.3%)为EI+。N+患者的中位生存期低于N-患者(29个月对57个月,p < 0.001)。在无标准受累的患者中,C+患者(n = 19)的生存期比C-患者(n = 47)差(34个月对57个月,p = 0.037)。在S+患者中,当LN S+数量<2时,C状态与预后相关(p = 0.07)。EI状态对预后无影响。多因素分析显示,仅神经周围侵犯(p = 0.02)和LN比率(p = 0.042)是独立的预后因素。
肿瘤对LN的直接侵犯预示生存期缩短,但与标准LN受累及神经周围侵犯相比影响较小。