Wu Zhen, Gros-Louis Julie
Department of Psychology,University of Iowa.
J Child Lang. 2015 May;42(3):538-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000914000221. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
Existing studies have observed a robust relationship between infants' pointing gestures and language outcomes. By contrast, infants' overall vocal production is not related to language outcomes. One possible explanation for the association between pointing and language is that pointing gestures, as compared to vocalizations, may elicit more verbal responses from social partners that are facilitative for language learning. To test this, we observed forty-seven infants aged 1;0 during free play with their mothers and fathers separately to compare parents' verbal responses to infants' pointing gestures and object-directed vocalizations. Results showed that, compared to object-directed vocalizations, infants' pointing elicited more verbal responses from parents, particularly object labels. Moreover, mothers were more likely than fathers to provide labels. These results may help explain why pointing is associated with indices of language acquisition, but the production of vocalizations is not.
现有研究观察到婴儿的指示性手势与语言发展结果之间存在紧密联系。相比之下,婴儿的整体发声与语言发展结果并无关联。指示与语言之间存在关联的一种可能解释是,与发声相比,指示性手势可能会从社交伙伴那里引发更多有助于语言学习的言语回应。为了验证这一点,我们分别观察了47名1岁的婴儿与他们的母亲和父亲自由玩耍时的情况,以比较父母对婴儿指示性手势和指向物体发声的言语回应。结果显示,与指向物体发声相比,婴儿的指示性手势从父母那里引发了更多的言语回应,尤其是物体标签。此外,母亲比父亲更有可能提供标签。这些结果或许有助于解释为什么指示与语言习得指标相关,而发声却并非如此。