• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前列腺癌的扩散峰度成像研究:初步结果。

Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.

作者信息

Tamura Chiharu, Shinmoto Hiroshi, Soga Shigeyoshi, Okamura Teppei, Sato Hiroki, Okuaki Tomoyuki, Pang Yuxi, Kosuda Shigeru, Kaji Tatsumi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):723-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24379. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1002/jmri.24379
PMID:24924835
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) between prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and benign peripheral zone (PZ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four foci of prostate cancer, 41 BPH nodules (14 stromal and 27 nonstromal hyperplasia), and 20 benign PZ from 20 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were investigated. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using 11 b-values (0-1500 s/mm(2) ). DKI model relates DWI signal decay to parameters that reflect non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (D) and deviations from normal distribution (K). A mixed model analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the statistical significance of the metrics of DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).

RESULTS

K was significantly higher in prostate cancer and stromal BPH than in benign PZ (1.19 ± 0.24 and 0.99 ± 0.28 versus 0.63 ± 0.23, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). K showed a trend toward higher levels in prostate cancer than in stromal BPH (1.19 ± 0.24 versus 0.99 ± 0.28, P = 0.051). On the ROC analyses, a significant difference in area under the curve was not observed between K and ADC, however, K showed the highest sensitivity among three parameters.

CONCLUSION

DKI may contribute to the imaging diagnosis of prostate cancer, especially in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and BPH.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺癌、良性前列腺增生(BPH)和良性外周带(PZ)之间扩散峰度成像(DKI)参数的差异。

材料与方法

对20例行根治性前列腺切除术患者的24个前列腺癌病灶、41个BPH结节(14个基质增生和27个非基质增生)及20个良性PZ进行研究。使用11个b值(0 - 1500 s/mm²)进行扩散加权成像(DWI)。DKI模型将DWI信号衰减与反映非高斯扩散系数(D)和偏离正态分布(K)的参数相关联。进行方差混合模型分析和受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,以评估DKI指标和表观扩散系数(ADC)的统计学意义。

结果

前列腺癌和基质性BPH中的K值显著高于良性PZ(分别为1.19±0.24和0.99±0.28对比0.63±0.23,P < 0.001和P < 0.001)。K值在前列腺癌中呈现出高于基质性BPH的趋势(1.19±0.24对比0.99±0.28,P = 0.051)。在ROC分析中,未观察到K值和ADC值曲线下面积的显著差异,然而,K值在三个参数中显示出最高的敏感性。

结论

DKI可能有助于前列腺癌的影像诊断,尤其是在前列腺癌与BPH的鉴别诊断中。

相似文献

1
Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.前列腺癌的扩散峰度成像研究:初步结果。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):723-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24379. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
2
Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在周围区前列腺癌检测及分级中的评估
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.
3
Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.前列腺癌:扩散峰度模型检测和评估外周区癌侵袭性的可行性及初步经验。
Radiology. 2012 Jul;264(1):126-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112290. Epub 2012 May 1.
4
Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.应用单指数和双指数扩散加权成像鉴别中央腺体前列腺癌与前列腺增生。
Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Oct;31(8):1318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.03.002. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
5
Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.扩散峰度成像在前列腺癌诊断评估中的应用:在活检人群中的检测。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Sep;118:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
6
Advanced Diffusion-weighted Imaging Modeling for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Correlation with Quantitative Histopathologic Tumor Tissue Composition-A Hypothesis-generating Study.高级扩散加权成像模型在前列腺癌特征描述中的应用:与定量组织病理学肿瘤组织成分的相关性——一项假说生成研究。
Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):918-928. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170904. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的非高斯水扩散峰度成像
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;32(5):421-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.015. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
An intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging study of prostate cancer.前列腺癌的体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Oct;199(4):W496-500. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8347.
9
Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using a statistical model based on the gamma distribution.基于伽马分布的统计模型对前列腺癌进行扩散加权成像。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Jul;42(1):56-62. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24761. Epub 2014 Sep 15.
10
Diffusion-tensor MRI at 3 T: differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia.3T 弥散张量 MRI:鉴别中央腺体前列腺癌与前列腺增生。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Mar;202(3):W254-62. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11015.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion models parameters and mono-exponential apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.前列腺癌患者中扩散模型参数与单指数表观扩散系数诊断性能的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Res Med Sci. 2024 Jul 30;29:43. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_359_23. eCollection 2024.
2
Synthetic DWI: contrast improvement for diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate using T1 shine-through by synthesizing images with adjusted TR and TE.合成扩散加权成像:通过合成具有调整后的重复时间(TR)和回波时间(TE)的图像,利用T1透过效应改善前列腺扩散加权成像的对比度。
MAGMA. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1007/s10334-025-01243-5.
3
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: A review of current technology.
前列腺癌的定量磁共振成像:当前技术综述
World J Radiol. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):497-511. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i10.497.
4
The value of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.合成磁共振成像在前列腺癌侵袭性诊断和评估中的价值。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Aug 1;14(8):5473-5489. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-291. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Unveiling the diagnostic potential of diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion for detecting and characterizing prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.揭示扩散峰度成像和体素内不相干运动在前列腺癌检测和特征描述中的诊断潜力:一项荟萃分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):319-335. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04454-x. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Histogram analysis of MR quantitative parameters: are they correlated with prognostic factors in prostate cancer?MR 定量参数直方图分析:它们与前列腺癌的预后因素相关吗?
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024 May;49(5):1534-1544. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04227-6. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
7
Enhancing Diagnostic Precision: Evaluation of Preprocessing Filters in Simple Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging for Head and Neck Tumors.提高诊断精度:头颈部肿瘤简单扩散峰度成像中预处理滤波器的评估
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 20;13(6):1783. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061783.
8
Diffusion kurtosis imaging and standard diffusion imaging in the magnetic resonance imaging assessment of prostate cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在前列腺癌磁共振成像评估中的应用
Gland Surg. 2023 Dec 26;12(12):1806-1822. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-53. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
9
Optimal selection of b-values for differential diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes using diffusion-weighted imaging.利用扩散加权成像对纵隔淋巴结进行鉴别诊断时b值的最佳选择
Heliyon. 2023 May 26;9(6):e16702. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16702. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Comparison of machine learning models based on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound videos for the prediction of prostate cancer.基于多参数磁共振成像和超声视频的机器学习模型在预测前列腺癌方面的比较。
Front Oncol. 2023 May 16;13:1157949. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1157949. eCollection 2023.