Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌的扩散峰度成像研究:初步结果。

Diffusion kurtosis imaging study of prostate cancer: preliminary findings.

作者信息

Tamura Chiharu, Shinmoto Hiroshi, Soga Shigeyoshi, Okamura Teppei, Sato Hiroki, Okuaki Tomoyuki, Pang Yuxi, Kosuda Shigeru, Kaji Tatsumi

机构信息

Department of Radiology, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Sep;40(3):723-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24379. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in parameters of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) between prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and benign peripheral zone (PZ).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four foci of prostate cancer, 41 BPH nodules (14 stromal and 27 nonstromal hyperplasia), and 20 benign PZ from 20 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were investigated. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) was performed using 11 b-values (0-1500 s/mm(2) ). DKI model relates DWI signal decay to parameters that reflect non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (D) and deviations from normal distribution (K). A mixed model analysis of variance and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess the statistical significance of the metrics of DKI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).

RESULTS

K was significantly higher in prostate cancer and stromal BPH than in benign PZ (1.19 ± 0.24 and 0.99 ± 0.28 versus 0.63 ± 0.23, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). K showed a trend toward higher levels in prostate cancer than in stromal BPH (1.19 ± 0.24 versus 0.99 ± 0.28, P = 0.051). On the ROC analyses, a significant difference in area under the curve was not observed between K and ADC, however, K showed the highest sensitivity among three parameters.

CONCLUSION

DKI may contribute to the imaging diagnosis of prostate cancer, especially in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and BPH.

摘要

目的

评估前列腺癌、良性前列腺增生(BPH)和良性外周带(PZ)之间扩散峰度成像(DKI)参数的差异。

材料与方法

对20例行根治性前列腺切除术患者的24个前列腺癌病灶、41个BPH结节(14个基质增生和27个非基质增生)及20个良性PZ进行研究。使用11个b值(0 - 1500 s/mm²)进行扩散加权成像(DWI)。DKI模型将DWI信号衰减与反映非高斯扩散系数(D)和偏离正态分布(K)的参数相关联。进行方差混合模型分析和受试者操作特征(ROC)分析,以评估DKI指标和表观扩散系数(ADC)的统计学意义。

结果

前列腺癌和基质性BPH中的K值显著高于良性PZ(分别为1.19±0.24和0.99±0.28对比0.63±0.23,P < 0.001和P < 0.001)。K值在前列腺癌中呈现出高于基质性BPH的趋势(1.19±0.24对比0.99±0.28,P = 0.051)。在ROC分析中,未观察到K值和ADC值曲线下面积的显著差异,然而,K值在三个参数中显示出最高的敏感性。

结论

DKI可能有助于前列腺癌的影像诊断,尤其是在前列腺癌与BPH的鉴别诊断中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验