• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在宏观生态梯度上,森林竞争在生产力最高的地点最为强烈。

Across a macro-ecological gradient forest competition is strongest at the most productive sites.

机构信息

School of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania Hobart, TAS, Australia.

出版信息

Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 5;5:260. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00260. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3389/fpls.2014.00260
PMID:24926304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4046579/
Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the effect of forest basal area on tree growth interacts with macro-ecological gradients of primary productivity, using a large dataset of eucalypt tree growth collected across temperate and sub- tropical mesic Australia. To do this, we derived an index of inter-tree competition based on stand basal area (stand BA) relative to the climatically determined potential basal area. Using linear mixed effects modeling, we found that the main effects of climatic productivity, tree size, and competition explained 26.5% of the deviance in individual tree growth, but adding interactions to the model could explain a further 8.9%. The effect of competition on growth interacts with the gradient of climatic productivity, with negligible effect of competition in low productivity environments, but marked negative effects at the most productive sites. We also found a positive interaction between tree size and stand BA, which was most pronounced in the most productive sites. We interpret these patterns as reflecting intense competition for light amongst maturing trees on more productive sites, and below ground moisture limitation at low productivity sites, which results in open stands with little competition for light. These trends are consistent with the life history and stand development of eucalypt forests: in cool moist environments, light is the most limiting resource, resulting in size-asymmetric competition, while in hot, low rainfall environments are open forests with little competition for light but where the amount of tree regeneration is limited by water availability.

摘要

我们利用在澳大利亚温带和亚热带湿润地区收集的大量桉树生长数据,检验了森林基面积对树木生长的影响与主要生产力宏生态学梯度相互作用的假设。为此,我们根据林分基面积相对于气候决定的潜在基面积,得出了一个树木间竞争指数。通过线性混合效应模型,我们发现气候生产力、树木大小和竞争的主要效应解释了个体树木生长差异的 26.5%,但在模型中加入相互作用可以进一步解释 8.9%。竞争对生长的影响与生产力梯度相互作用,在低生产力环境中竞争的影响可以忽略不计,但在最具生产力的地点则产生明显的负面影响。我们还发现树木大小和林分基面积之间存在正相互作用,在最具生产力的地点最为明显。我们将这些模式解释为反映了在生产力较高的地方,成熟树木之间对光的激烈竞争,以及在低生产力地区地下水分限制,导致光竞争很少的开阔林分。这些趋势与桉树森林的生活史和林分发育一致:在凉爽潮湿的环境中,光资源是最受限制的,导致大小不对称竞争,而在炎热、低降雨量的环境中,林分开阔,光竞争很少,但树木再生的数量受到水分供应的限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/9120e0245918/fpls-05-00260-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/7fb96e557e83/fpls-05-00260-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/d274f2f5fc2d/fpls-05-00260-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/512afc9fae18/fpls-05-00260-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/88dabff869bd/fpls-05-00260-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/428d02560dde/fpls-05-00260-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/66cc18596417/fpls-05-00260-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/dfd97ac26d00/fpls-05-00260-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/9120e0245918/fpls-05-00260-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/7fb96e557e83/fpls-05-00260-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/d274f2f5fc2d/fpls-05-00260-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/512afc9fae18/fpls-05-00260-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/88dabff869bd/fpls-05-00260-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/428d02560dde/fpls-05-00260-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/66cc18596417/fpls-05-00260-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/dfd97ac26d00/fpls-05-00260-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b7f/4046579/9120e0245918/fpls-05-00260-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Across a macro-ecological gradient forest competition is strongest at the most productive sites.在宏观生态梯度上,森林竞争在生产力最高的地点最为强烈。
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 5;5:260. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00260. eCollection 2014.
2
Tree Size Inequality Reduces Forest Productivity: An Analysis Combining Inventory Data for Ten European Species and a Light Competition Model.树高大小差异降低森林生产力:结合十种欧洲树种的清查数据和一个轻度竞争模型的分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 21;11(3):e0151852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151852. eCollection 2016.
3
Relationships of intra-annual stem growth with climate indicate distinct growth niches for two co-occurring temperate eucalypts.年内茎生长与气候的关系表明,两种共生的温带桉树具有明显不同的生长生态位。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Nov 10;690:991-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
4
Asymmetric competition, ontogenetic growth and size inequality drive the difference in productivity between two-strata and one-stratum forest stands.不对称竞争、个体发育生长和大小不平等导致了两层林分和单层林分之间生产力的差异。
Theor Popul Biol. 2019 Dec;130:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
5
Competition influences tree growth, but not mortality, across environmental gradients in Amazonia and tropical Africa.竞争影响树木生长,但不影响死亡率,这在亚马逊和热带非洲的环境梯度中都是如此。
Ecology. 2020 Jul;101(7):e03052. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3052. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Macroecology of Australian Tall Eucalypt Forests: Baseline Data from a Continental-Scale Permanent Plot Network.澳大利亚高大桉树林的宏观生态学:来自大陆尺度永久样地网络的基线数据。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137811. eCollection 2015.
7
Effects of Competition, Drought Stress and Photosynthetic Productivity on the Radial Growth of White Spruce in Western Canada.竞争、干旱胁迫和光合生产力对加拿大西部白云杉径向生长的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 7;8:1915. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01915. eCollection 2017.
8
The relationship between tree size and tree water-use: is competition for water size-symmetric or size-asymmetric?树木大小与树木耗水之间的关系:水分竞争是大小对称的还是大小不对称的?
Tree Physiol. 2022 Oct 7;42(10):1916-1927. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpac018.
9
Evidence of non-stationary relationships between climate and forest responses: Increased sensitivity to climate change in Iberian forests.气候与森林响应之间非平稳关系的证据:伊比利亚森林对气候变化的敏感性增加。
Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Sep;26(9):5063-5076. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15198. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
10
Are the eucalypt and non-eucalypt components of Australian tropical savannas independent?澳大利亚热带稀树草原的桉树和非桉树成分是否相互独立?
Oecologia. 2011 May;166(1):229-39. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1829-4. Epub 2010 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Size-growth asymmetry is not consistently related to productivity across an eastern US temperate forest network.在美国东部温带森林网络中,大小增长不对称与生产力之间的关系并不一致。
Oecologia. 2019 Feb;189(2):515-528. doi: 10.1007/s00442-018-4318-9. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
Effects of Competition, Drought Stress and Photosynthetic Productivity on the Radial Growth of White Spruce in Western Canada.竞争、干旱胁迫和光合生产力对加拿大西部白云杉径向生长的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Nov 7;8:1915. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01915. eCollection 2017.
3
Macroecology of Australian Tall Eucalypt Forests: Baseline Data from a Continental-Scale Permanent Plot Network.

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants.决定植物间竞争中大小不对称程度的机制。
Oecologia. 1998 Feb;113(4):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s004420050397.
2
Big eucalypts grow more slowly in a warm climate: evidence of an interaction between tree size and temperature.大桉树在温暖的气候中生长得更慢:这是树木大小和温度相互作用的证据。
Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Sep;20(9):2793-9. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12540. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
3
Giant eucalypts - globally unique fire-adapted rain-forest trees?巨桉——全球独一无二的适应火灾的雨林树木?
澳大利亚高大桉树林的宏观生态学:来自大陆尺度永久样地网络的基线数据。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 14;10(9):e0137811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137811. eCollection 2015.
4
Eucalyptus obliqua seedling growth in organic vs. mineral soil horizons.斜叶桉幼苗在有机土与矿质土土层中的生长情况。
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Feb 20;6:97. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00097. eCollection 2015.
New Phytol. 2012 Dec;196(4):1001-1014. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04359.x. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
4
Positive interactions in communities.社区中的积极互动。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 May;9(5):191-3. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4. Epub 2003 Nov 7.
5
Re-evaluation of forest biomass carbon stocks and lessons from the world's most carbon-dense forests.森林生物量碳储量的重新评估及世界碳密度最高森林的经验教训
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 14;106(28):11635-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901970106. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
6
Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests.新英格兰森林中沿环境梯度的冠层树木竞争邻域分析。
Ecol Appl. 2006 Apr;16(2):540-54. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0540:naoctc]2.0.co;2.