Mercadante Sebastiano, Porzio Giampiero, Adile Claudio, Aielli Federica, Cortegiani Andrea, Dickenson Anthony, Casuccio Alessandra
Anesthesia & Intensive Care and Pain Relief & Supportive Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center , Palermo , Italy.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Oct;30(10):2063-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.934793. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of tapentadol (TP) for a period of 4 weeks in patients who were already treated by opioids.
A convenience sample of 30 patients was selected for a prospective observational cohort study. Cancer patients who were receiving at least 60 mg of oral morphine equivalents were selected. Patients discontinued their previous opioid analgesics before starting TP, in doses calculated according the previous opioid consumption (1:3.3 ratio with oral morphine equivalents). The subsequent doses were changed according to the patients' needs for a period of 4 weeks. Oral morphine was offered as a breakthrough pain medication. Pain and symptom intensity were recorded at weekly intervals. Distress score (DS) was calculated from the sum of symptom intensities. TP opioid escalation indexes (TPEI) for the study period were calculated.
Nineteen patients were male, and the mean age was 63.5 years (±11.5). The mean Karnofsky status was 62.9 (±10). The mean dose of oral morphine equivalents before switching to TP was 112 mg (±57) and the initial mean dose of TP was 343 mg (±150). Pain intensity significantly decreased. Tapentadol escalation index in percentage was 1.26 (TPEI% ± 2.6) and Tapentadol escalation index in mg was 2.76 (TPEImg ± 4.96). No significant relationships were found with primary tumor (TPEI%, p = 0.204; TPEImg, p = 0.180), pain mechanism (TPEI%, p = 0.863; TPEImg, p = 0.846), age (TPEI%, p = 0.882; TPEImg, p = 0.884), or gender (TPEI%, p = 0.287; TPEImg, p = 0.325). DS decreased, but non-significantly (p = 0.1). Ten patients did not complete the study period: five patients discontinued TP for uncontrolled pain, despite increasing doses of TP over 600 mg/day. Two patients discontinued TP for adverse effects and three patients dropped out, one patient for poor compliance and two patients for unrecorded reasons.
In our sample, TP used in doses of 350-450 mg/day was well tolerated and effective in opioid tolerant patients with cancer pain and could be considered as a flexible drug to be used for the management of moderate to severe cancer pain. Like most studies in patients with cancer pain, it was limited by its open-label, uncontrolled design, the number of patients lost in follow-up, and discontinuation of the treatment for several reasons. Further studies in a large number of patients should confirm these preliminary results.
本研究旨在评估曲马多(TP)在已接受阿片类药物治疗的患者中使用4周的疗效和耐受性。
选取30例患者作为便利样本进行前瞻性观察队列研究。入选正在接受至少60毫克口服吗啡等效剂量的癌症患者。患者在开始使用TP前停用先前的阿片类镇痛药,剂量根据先前阿片类药物的消耗量计算(与口服吗啡等效剂量的比例为1:3.3)。随后的剂量根据患者需求在4周内进行调整。口服吗啡作为突破性疼痛药物使用。每周记录疼痛和症状强度。根据症状强度总和计算痛苦评分(DS)。计算研究期间的TP阿片类药物升级指数(TPEI)。
19例患者为男性,平均年龄为63.5岁(±11.5)。卡诺夫斯基状态平均为62.9(±10)。转换为TP前口服吗啡等效剂量的平均剂量为112毫克(±57),TP的初始平均剂量为343毫克(±150)。疼痛强度显著降低。曲马多升级指数百分比为1.26(TPEI%±2.6),曲马多升级指数毫克数为2.76(TPEImg±4.96)。未发现与原发性肿瘤(TPEI%,p = 0.204;TPEImg,p = 0.180)、疼痛机制(TPEI%,p = 0.863;TPEImg,p = 0.846)、年龄(TPEI%,p = 0.882;TPEImg,p = 0.884)或性别(TPEI%,p = 0.287;TPEImg,p = 0.325)有显著关系。DS降低,但无统计学意义(p = 0.1)。10例患者未完成研究期:5例患者尽管TP剂量增加至超过600毫克/天,但因疼痛未得到控制而停用TP。2例患者因不良反应停用TP,3例患者退出研究,1例患者因依从性差,2例患者因未记录的原因。
在我们的样本中,每天使用350 - 450毫克剂量的TP在阿片类药物耐受的癌症疼痛患者中耐受性良好且有效,可被视为用于管理中度至重度癌症疼痛的灵活药物。与大多数癌症疼痛患者的研究一样,本研究受到其开放标签、非对照设计、随访中失访患者数量以及因多种原因中断治疗的限制。大量患者的进一步研究应证实这些初步结果。