Lewis Peter, Baskaran Karthikeyan, Rosén Robert, Lundström Linda, Unsbo Peter, Gustafsson Jörgen
*BOptom †PhD ‡PhD, FAAO Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnæus University, Kalmar, Sweden (PL, KB, JG); and Biomedical and X-Ray Physics, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (RR, LL, PU).
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Jul;91(7):740-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000301.
The purpose of this study was twofold: to verify a fast, clinically applicable method for determining off-axis refraction and to assess the impact of objectively obtained off-axis refractive correction on peripheral low-contrast visual acuity.
We measured peripheral low-contrast resolution acuity with Gabor patches both with and without off-axis correction at 20 degrees in the nasal visual field of 10 emmetropic subjects; the correction was obtained using a commercial open-field Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor, the COAS-HD VR aberrometer. Off-axis refractive errors were calculated for a 5-mm circular pupil inscribed within the elliptical wavefront by COAS using the instruments' inbuilt "Seidel sphere" method.
Most of the subjects had simple myopic astigmatism, at 20 degrees in the nasal visual field ranging from -1.00 to -2.00 DC, with axis orientations generally near 90 degrees. The mean uncorrected and corrected low-contrast resolution acuities for all subjects were 0.92 and 0.86 logMAR, respectively (an improvement of 0.06 logMAR). For subjects with a scalar power refractive error of 1.00 diopters or more, the average improvement was 0.1 logMAR. The observed changes in low-contrast resolution acuity were strongly correlated with off-axis astigmatism (Pearson r = 0.95; p < 0.0001), the J180 cross-cylinder component (Pearson r = 0.82; p = 0.0034), and power scalar (Pearson r = -0.75; p = 0.0126).
The results suggest that there are definite benefits in correcting even moderate amounts of off-axis refractive errors; in this study, as little as -1.50 DC of off-axis astigmatism gave improvements of up to a line in visual acuity. It may be even more pertinent for people who rely on optimal peripheral visual function, specifically those with central visual field loss; the use of open-field aberrometers could be clinically useful in rapidly determining off-axis refractive errors specifically for this patient group who are generally more challenging to refract.
本研究有两个目的:验证一种快速、临床适用的离轴屈光测定方法,并评估客观获得的离轴屈光矫正对周边低对比度视力的影响。
我们在10名正视眼受试者的鼻侧视野20度处,使用加博尔视标测量了有无离轴矫正情况下的周边低对比度分辨视力;矫正通过商用开放式哈特曼-夏克波前传感器COAS-HD VR像差仪获得。使用该仪器内置的“赛德尔球镜”方法,由COAS计算椭圆波前内5毫米圆形瞳孔的离轴屈光不正。
大多数受试者有单纯近视散光,在鼻侧视野20度处,散光度数在-1.00至-2.00 DC之间,轴位方向一般接近90度。所有受试者未矫正和矫正后的低对比度分辨视力平均值分别为0.92和0.86 logMAR(提高了0.06 logMAR)。对于标量屈光不正度数为1.00屈光度或更高的受试者,平均提高了0.1 logMAR。观察到的低对比度分辨视力变化与离轴散光(皮尔逊r = 0.95;p < 0.0001)、J180交叉柱镜分量(皮尔逊r = 0.82;p = 0.0034)和屈光标量(皮尔逊r = -0.75;p = 0.0126)密切相关。
结果表明,即使矫正适度的离轴屈光不正也有明确益处;在本研究中,低至-1.50 DC的离轴散光可使视力提高多达一行。对于依赖最佳周边视觉功能的人,特别是那些有中心视野缺损的人,可能更为重要;使用开放式像差仪在临床上可能有助于快速确定离轴屈光不正,特别是对于这一通常更难验光的患者群体。