El-Shormilisy Nina, Strong Jenny, Meredith Pamela J
Pain Res Manag. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):48-55. doi: 10.1155/2015/490610. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
Developing strategies for coping with chronic pain is an integral part of successfully living with this often debilitating health condition. While gender differences in pain coping strategies have long been investigated, the relationship between gender-specific engagement in coping and associated functioning in individuals experiencing chronic pain is yet to be clearly understood.
The present systematic review focused on studies that address these relationships to critically evaluate the available evidence.
A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL, with 7247 titles retrieved. To be included, studies had to be in English, focus on adult participants, consider chronic nonmalignant pain, use measures of coping and functioning (or disability), report on gender-specific outcomes (for coping and functioning [or disability]), and investigate a relationship among gender, coping and functioning. One researcher screened abstracts and full-text articles, and extracted and tabulated data, while two researchers independently assessed potential articles for eligibility and methodological quality.
Only seven studies met the inclusion criteria - six of high quality and one of moderate quality. The presented findings suggest that women in pain are more likely to use coping strategies considered to be maladaptive, resulting in poorer functioning, while men tend to engage in coping strategies considered to be adaptive, leading to better functional outcomes.
While there is some evidence supporting gender-specific engagement in coping and associated functioning, future research is necessary to expand understanding of these interrelations.
制定应对慢性疼痛的策略是成功应对这种往往使人衰弱的健康状况的一个不可或缺的部分。虽然长期以来一直在研究疼痛应对策略中的性别差异,但在经历慢性疼痛的个体中,特定性别的应对方式与相关功能之间的关系尚未得到明确理解。
本系统评价聚焦于探讨这些关系的研究,以批判性地评估现有证据。
通过Ovid平台使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和CINAHL进行系统检索,共检索到7247篇文献标题。纳入的研究必须为英文,聚焦成年参与者,考虑慢性非恶性疼痛,使用应对和功能(或残疾)的测量方法,报告特定性别的结果(应对和功能[或残疾]方面),并研究性别、应对和功能之间的关系。一名研究人员筛选摘要和全文文章,提取并整理数据,同时两名研究人员独立评估潜在文章的纳入资格和方法学质量。
只有七项研究符合纳入标准,其中六项高质量研究,一项中等质量研究。研究结果表明,疼痛女性更有可能使用被认为是适应不良的应对策略,导致功能较差,而男性倾向于采用被认为是适应性的应对策略,从而产生更好的功能结果。
虽然有一些证据支持特定性别的应对方式及相关功能,但未来仍需开展研究以加深对这些相互关系的理解。