Virkki Minttu T, Peters Christoph, Nilsson Daniel, Sörensen Therese, Cristobal Susana, Wallner Björn, Elofsson Arne
Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, SE-171 21 Solna, Sweden; Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, SE-171 21 Solna, Sweden; Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; Swedish e-Science Research Center (SeRC), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
J Mol Biol. 2014 Aug 12;426(16):2982-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.06.002. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
The translocon recognizes transmembrane helices with sufficient level of hydrophobicity and inserts them into the membrane. However, sometimes less hydrophobic helices are also recognized. Positive inside rule, orientational preferences of and specific interactions with neighboring helices have been shown to aid in the recognition of these helices, at least in artificial systems. To better understand how the translocon inserts marginally hydrophobic helices, we studied three naturally occurring marginally hydrophobic helices, which were previously shown to require the subsequent helix for efficient translocon recognition. We find no evidence for specific interactions when we scan all residues in the subsequent helices. Instead, we identify arginines located at the N-terminal part of the subsequent helices that are crucial for the recognition of the marginally hydrophobic transmembrane helices, indicating that the positive inside rule is important. However, in two of the constructs, these arginines do not aid in the recognition without the rest of the subsequent helix; that is, the positive inside rule alone is not sufficient. Instead, the improved recognition of marginally hydrophobic helices can here be explained as follows: the positive inside rule provides an orientational preference of the subsequent helix, which in turn allows the marginally hydrophobic helix to be inserted; that is, the effect of the positive inside rule is stronger if positively charged residues are followed by a transmembrane helix. Such a mechanism obviously cannot aid C-terminal helices, and consequently, we find that the terminal helices in multi-spanning membrane proteins are more hydrophobic than internal helices.
转运体识别具有足够疏水水平的跨膜螺旋,并将它们插入膜中。然而,有时疏水性较低的螺旋也能被识别。“正内规则”、相邻螺旋的取向偏好以及与相邻螺旋的特异性相互作用已被证明有助于这些螺旋的识别,至少在人工系统中是这样。为了更好地理解转运体如何插入疏水性较低的螺旋,我们研究了三种天然存在的疏水性较低的螺旋,之前的研究表明这些螺旋需要后续的螺旋才能实现有效的转运体识别。当我们扫描后续螺旋中的所有残基时,没有发现特异性相互作用的证据。相反,我们确定了位于后续螺旋N端部分的精氨酸对于识别疏水性较低的跨膜螺旋至关重要,这表明“正内规则”很重要。然而,在其中两个构建体中,如果没有后续螺旋的其余部分,这些精氨酸无助于识别;也就是说,仅“正内规则”是不够的。相反,这里对疏水性较低螺旋的识别改善可以解释如下:“正内规则”提供了后续螺旋的取向偏好,这反过来又允许疏水性较低的螺旋被插入;也就是说,如果带正电荷的残基后面跟着一个跨膜螺旋,“正内规则”的效果会更强。这样一种机制显然对C端螺旋没有帮助,因此,我们发现多跨膜蛋白中的末端螺旋比内部螺旋更疏水。