Schauenburg Gesche, Ambrasat Jens, Schröder Tobias, von Scheve Christian, Conrad Markus
Department of General and Neurocognitive Psychology and Cluster "Languages of Emotion", Freie Universität Berlin, Habelschwerdter Allee 45, 14195, Berlin, Germany,
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Sep;47(3):720-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0494-7.
We present a database of 858 German words from the semantic fields of authority and community, which represent core dimensions of human sociality. The words were selected on the basis of co-occurrence profiles of representative keywords for these semantic fields. All words were rated along five dimensions, each measured by a bipolar semantic-differential scale: Besides the classic dimensions of affective meaning (valence, arousal, and potency), we collected ratings of authority and community with newly developed scales. The results from cluster, correlational, and multiple regression analyses on the rating data suggest a robust negativity bias for authority valuation among German raters recruited via university mailing lists, whereas community ratings appear to be rather unrelated to the well-established affective dimensions. Furthermore, our data involve a strong overall negative correlation-rather than the classical U-shaped distribution-between valence and arousal for socially relevant concepts. Our database provides a valuable resource for research questions at the intersection of cognitive neuroscience and social psychology. It can be downloaded as supplemental materials with this article.
我们展示了一个包含858个德语单词的数据库,这些单词来自权威和社群的语义领域,代表了人类社会性的核心维度。这些单词是根据这些语义领域的代表性关键词的共现概况挑选出来的。所有单词都沿着五个维度进行评分,每个维度都由一个双极语义差异量表测量:除了情感意义的经典维度(效价、唤醒和强度)外,我们还使用新开发的量表收集了权威和社群的评分。对评分数据进行聚类、相关和多元回归分析的结果表明,通过大学邮件列表招募的德国评分者在权威评估中存在强烈的消极偏见,而社群评分似乎与既定的情感维度关系不大。此外,我们的数据显示,对于社会相关概念,效价和唤醒之间存在强烈的总体负相关,而不是经典的U形分布。我们的数据库为认知神经科学和社会心理学交叉领域的研究问题提供了宝贵资源。它可以作为本文的补充材料下载。