Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences (ICBS), Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2024 Aug 28;53(5):69. doi: 10.1007/s10936-024-10104-6.
Research frequently uses words as stimuli to assess cognitive and psychological processes. However, various attributes of these words, such as their semantic and emotional aspects, could potentially confound study results if not properly controlled. This study aims to establish a reliable foundation for the semantic and emotional aspects of words for research in Persian. To this end, the present study provided norms for 718 Persian nouns in arousal, valence, familiarity, and animacy dimensions. The words were selected from a previous English dataset (Warriner et al. in Behav Res Methods 45(4):1191-1207, 2013), translated into Persian, and rated by a total of 463 native Persian-speaking participants. The ratings were obtained through an online questionnaire using a 9-point Likert scale for emotional dimensions (i.e., valence and arousal) and a 5-point Likert scale for semantic dimensions (i.e., familiarity and animacy). The reliability of the ratings was measured using the split-half method, and the result indicated a high consistency of ratings in all dimensions. To assess the relationship between the emotional and semantic dimensions, Pearson correlation coefficient was conducted. Gender differences were investigated through the Mann-Whitney U test, and significant differences were observed in all dimensions. These results are compared with findings from previous studies that were conducted in various languages.
研究经常使用词汇作为刺激物来评估认知和心理过程。然而,如果这些词汇的各种属性(如语义和情感方面)得不到适当的控制,它们可能会混淆研究结果。本研究旨在为波斯语研究中的词汇的语义和情感方面建立一个可靠的基础。为此,本研究在唤醒、效价、熟悉度和生动性维度上为 718 个波斯语名词提供了规范。这些词选自以前的英语数据集(Warriner 等人,Behav Res Methods 45(4):1191-1207, 2013),被翻译成波斯语,并由总共 463 名以波斯语为母语的参与者进行了评价。通过在线问卷,使用 9 点 Likert 量表对情感维度(即效价和唤醒)和 5 点 Likert 量表对语义维度(即熟悉度和生动性)进行了评价。使用分半法测量了评分的可靠性,结果表明所有维度的评分一致性都很高。为了评估情感和语义维度之间的关系,进行了 Pearson 相关系数分析。通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验调查了性别差异,在所有维度都观察到了显著差异。将这些结果与在各种语言中进行的先前研究的发现进行了比较。